Jenise wrote:Walter, you consider Salmon a warm water fish? As a former Alaskan and current resident of the Pac NW, I'd consider it a cold water fish where Opa, a resident of Hawaiian waters, is what I'd consider a warm water fish. But, honestly, I have no idea why/where parasites are more an issue than not.
You know Jenise, I just tried to find out what the deal is with parasites and couldn't locate a conclusive answer. Some sources said that it was the tuna's feeding at sea, away from mammal contamination that kept it clean. Other sources said it had more to do with the size of the fish. The explanation I'd heard previously was that tuna lived at depth in cold water. I found some statistics on salmon, and they typically stay within a couple meters of the surface, diving ~100 meters to feed. Bigeye tuna typically stayed 200-300 m down, diving as far as 1000 m to feed. Even in equatorial waters, that's going to be around 3C/38F, quite chilly.
If you're interested, there's a neat article from the Nat'l Oceanographic folks about tracking opah, along with some pictures of what has got to be the ugliest fish I'm willing to eat. I guess beauty really is skin deep because once you get through the thick, spotted skin of the opah, it's beautiful!
http://www.oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/projects/02census/pelagics/pelagics.html The article says that the opah occupy roughly the same depth as tuna, so maybe it is safe to eat raw. I'm going to pretend it is, if that's alright with everyone.
And agreed about the connective tissue--the store I was at had one humongous piece of opa, and I was able to specify where I wanted my piece cut from--which was far away from the visible tissue you mention.
Your fishmonger had a whole chunk of opah? That is lucky. We tend to see it already broken down into chunks, so it's a crapshoot trying to find one that's the right size and not too heavy on connective tissue. I really hope we get to try some when we're in Hawai'i next week.
Walt