Gary Barlettano
Pappone di Vino
1909
Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:50 pm
In a gallon jug far, far away ...
Bob Ross wrote:The Culinary Institute of America has a very simple definition: a broth is meant to be consumed as is; a stock is used as an ingredient in another dish.
Regards, Bob
Gary Barlettano
Pappone di Vino
1909
Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:50 pm
In a gallon jug far, far away ...
Bob Ross wrote:The Culinary Institute of America has a very simple definition: a broth is meant to be consumed as is; a stock is used as an ingredient in another dish.
Bob Ross wrote:The Culinary Institute of America has a very simple definition: a broth is meant to be consumed as is; a stock is used as an ingredient in another dish.
Regards, Bob
Gary Barlettano
Pappone di Vino
1909
Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:50 pm
In a gallon jug far, far away ...
John Tomasso wrote:Bob Ross wrote:As to the original post, I suppose it would depend upon what texture I was hoping to achieve in my pan sauce. If I am going for thickness, then I would reach for stock. If I wanted a more liquid consistency, then broth would suffice.
Bob Ross wrote:Thanks for mentioning this point -- my son's girl friend, an excellent Italian cook, calls tomato sauce "gravy" -- that's a Providence Rhode Island usage, perhaps broader. I'll have to ask her what "stock" is in Italian.
Regards, Bob
Jo Ann Henderson
Mealtime Maven
3990
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:34 am
Seattle, WA USA
I agree totally with the above. I also believe that it is difficult to get stock from vegetables, although, when the broth is reduced enough it will get syrupy from the natural pectins (which can be enhanced with the addition of citrus), but it does not result in the same richness you get with the addition of animal parts.When it comes to meat broths and stocks, this is what I was getting at, too. To my way of thinking, both items are flavorful liquids obtained through extraction, but the duration of the reduction time and the proportions of what you're extracting are different. Whereas I'd go for the simple meaty flavors and a shorter reduction time with a broth, I'd seek the gelatin with more bones and a longer reduction time (with perhaps some added herbs and spices) in a stock. The obvious spot where this view limps is, however, with regard to vegetables. Is there a difference between a vegetarian vegetable broth and a vegetarian vegetable stock? Ain't no bones in veggies!
Bob Ross wrote:The Culinary Institute of America has a very simple definition: a broth is meant to be consumed as is; a stock is used as an ingredient in another dish.
Regards, Bob
Jo Ann Henderson
Mealtime Maven
3990
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:34 am
Seattle, WA USA
Thx for the definition and the recipe, Bob. The above quote is absolutely for meat and vegetable stock. I avoid roasting shells and vegetables for seafood stocks (although I've seen it called for and it can be done) because most of them are turned into veloute sauces, which should retain that white or eggshell color for good presentation. Great information here folks!You can add a different, more intense flavor, by roasting the vegetables before making the stock.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests