Here are a couple of things I hate about the design of some cookbooks:
1. Tiny fonts. I made a good German Rye Beer bread today from one of my many bread cookbooks. It has some interesting recipes and, overall, I like it, but the ingredient lists are almost invisible. The ingredient typefaces are very thin and are a measured 5 points. On top of that, "en fractions" are used (the numerator is directly above the denominator and the whole fraction takes up the width of the letter "n."
I was browsing through the book last night and chose the rye bread recipe above. I couldn't make out the size of the fractions so I put on some reading glasses. No dice. I got off my couch and held the book directly under a lamp. Still no dice. I finally had to find a magnifying glass and determined one fraction in question was "1/3" (my fraction style is called a "fake fraction," as in 1-1/3 cups).
Curious as to the size of the font, I found my 10X magnifying font scale and determined 5-pt font was used (way bigger than the small print in contracts dah-dum-dum
). I was curious exactly how thin the typeface was so I placed a strand of my hair over the numerator, and they were exactly the same width. The whole thing is a product of stupid design and is not cook friendly.
2. When the font and paper are similar colors. One cookbook I tried to read in the evening under incandescent light had brown type on tan paper. It was impossible to read except in daylight. What's wrong with book designers?
I get some revenge, though. I've judged fiction/nonfiction books for about two decades, and I mark down any cookbooks with the above deficiencies.