Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Hoke
Achieving Wine Immortality
11420
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am
Portland, OR
Hoke
Achieving Wine Immortality
11420
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am
Portland, OR
Jon Peterson
The Court Winer
2981
Sat Apr 08, 2006 5:53 pm
The Blue Crab State
Hoke wrote:I think the whole "molecular for the masses" thing is hogwash. Perhaps it's something that said masses have heard about, but not experienced, and are interested in---but once those masses got a chance to try it, they'd avoid it like the plague.
The average eater, especially in fast food but even in moderately good restaurants, would be baffled by molecular gastronomy and foams and such, seeing it as nothing more than useless and expensive gimmickry (which, face it, a lot of that is).
Nope, they may want it, or think the want it, or want to try it out...but they wouldn't like it when they got it.
Robin Garr wrote:1. Miniature or single-serving desserts.
2. Indulgent desserts.
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43589
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:"Molecular for the Masses" makes me think of... astronaut ice cream!
Rahsaan wrote:Robin Garr wrote:1. Miniature or single-serving desserts.
2. Indulgent desserts.
What the heck do these mean. Is 'single-serving' 'single bite'? If it literally means 'serving size for one person' then that is so telling (and sad) that for the American restaurant industry it also means 'miniature'.
And aren't all desserts indulgent. Isn't that the concept. Not in size of course. But a slight sweet indulgence after the savory meal.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 1 guest