by Jenise » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:51 pm
I'm drooling! I've never tried to cook tri-tip that way, but I can imagine it being great and possibly even better than brisket would have been, as it's less dense.
Funny, I too have a tri-tip discovery story: last Friday night Bob and I stopped at the market on our way home from a barolo tasting. We needed milk, Contac for Bob's cold, and while there I picked up two hunks of meat, a chuck roast because I wanted meat to shred for ravioli and a tri-tip, because that cut was on sale and I like having something like that in the freezer for last-minute meal planning (I'll send it straight from the freezer to the outdoor grill to smoke/grill at the same time, it will be done rare in about three hours.) So when we got home Bob said you go on in, I'll bring the groceries. And I said great, I'll get the ice waters and see you upstairs. When I got up the next morning pretty close to 9 a.m. and went downstairs, what did I find? All the groceries right there on the counter, sans the cold medicine.
Dog excrement!
So I poured out the milk and put both hunks of meat in a Dutch oven with some broth, wine and onions to cover. After a few hours I went to test both pieces of meat: very interesting differences. The chuck had a stronger flavor that I didn't like as well as the milder tri tip, and of course a zillion pockets of fat one needed to cut around. The tri-tip also won my heart on texture, it was very evenly grained and had great mouth-feel. I then tested Bob on both, and he reached exactly the same conclusions. The tri-tip won on everything but price, and even that difference isn't as great as it would appear on paper since the tri-tip had virtually no waste and, of course, the chuck had quite a bit. Next time I make pot-au-feu? Tri-tip.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov