I'm not a baker. And I make about one batch of cookies every five years, so I have zero reflexes where cookies are concerned. But in the past few weeks I've made two batches of chocolate chip walnut cookies from the same recipe, yet I made them differently and the results were dramatic.
The recipe came from the back of the Ghirardelli chip package. I bought two different kinds of chips thinking I'd make a double batch, then changed my mind and only made a single. I verified before I started that the recipes were identical. For the first I used the standard semi-sweets. I creamed the butter and sugar together first as called for before adding the rest of the dry ingredients. I used the Kitchen Aid mixer. I used all the amounts as prescribed. The result was definitely a good cookie, but the texture of the cookie was too smooth and fine, and they even looked too smooth. Almost puffy. Those I made to serve with port (thank you, Elliot Apter, wherever you are!) by the fire pit to friends who were dropping by late.
Last night I made a second batch for Bob to take with him on a guy-outing. I used Ghirardelli's 60% cocoa chips. Never used these before. I didn't cream the butter and sugar, but rather mixed all ingredients at once, by hand. I used 1.7 sticks of butter instead of 2.0. The result was stiffer and grainier. The cookies mounded better and had a lot more texture. Hands down, Bob and I preferred these. Oh, and the 60% cocoa chips? Never again would I use anything else. They're larger, less waxy, and more honestly chocolate-y in a Belgian chocolate kind of way. Better alone, and better in the cookie after it's baked--a truly superior chocolate product. If you use chocolate chips in anything, try these!