Alan Wolfe
On Time Out status
2633
Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:34 am
West Virginia
Bill Spohn
He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'
9973
Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm
Vancouver BC
Alan Wolfe wrote:They forgot to include spraying it on your satellite dish(es) in snow country to avoid signal interruptions.
Alan Wolfe
On Time Out status
2633
Sat Mar 25, 2006 10:34 am
West Virginia
Hmm - wonder if you could spray the top of your car and have the snow just slide off ...
Hoke
Achieving Wine Immortality
11420
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am
Portland, OR
Bill Spohn
He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'
9973
Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm
Vancouver BC
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43595
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Bill Spohn
He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'
9973
Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm
Vancouver BC
Jenise wrote:I was afraid to open this topic. (Bill + Lubricants = DANGER)
Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
Carl Eppig
Our Maine man
4149
Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:38 pm
Middleton, NH, USA
Bob Henrick wrote:Pam? No one uses it for cooking? Well.......I don't blame them for that. I had almost never used it myself, until recently that is. In the past month or so I have been making cookies for the grand kids, and also making biscuits for breakfast and occasionally to pair with stews. My method was to place the cookie or biscuit dough on a rimmed cookie sheet that I had sprayed with the Pam original canola oil spray. The result was that the cookies and biscuits slid off very easily. (that was the desirable result) Conversely the undesirable result was that my cookie sheet now has a sticky residue that is resisting all efforts for removal. My next attempt will be to use a 50/50 mix of water and vinegar and bring the mixture to a boil, then dump the liquid and scrub like hell with a (hopefully) non scratching plastic cleaner thingie with some cleanser like Bon Ami or Bar Keepers Friend. any any all advice accepted....even the tongue-in- cheek kind.
Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
Carl Eppig wrote:That's why we cook all our cookies on parchment paper; depending on the cookie in question you can usually cook more than one batch on a sheet. With macaroons you need to change the sheet each time.
The only thing we use original Pam for cooking is to spray the inside of our smoker before using. We do use the butter and olive oil versions sparingly for other culinary practices.
Bob Henrick wrote:Conversely the undesirable result was that my cookie sheet now has a sticky residue that is resisting all efforts for removal.
Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:I have just resigned myself to the fact that cookware, other than stainless steel, will just eventually develop dark crud and need to be replaced.
Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:I don't own any cast iron, though I have occasionally used it (and liked it) when visiting friends.
I do have a certain fondness for my ceramic-lined Le Creuset casserole.
But, most often, I choose the non-stick over the steel. I have not seen enough difference in the outcome to justify the extra cleaning-up.
Mark Lipton wrote:Can you transfer the nonsticks to the oven? That's one of the big reasons why I use stainless steel for the most part (nonsticks for frying, though).
Bob, that dark crud is partially carbonized fats that take on a dark, gummy appearance. Apart from scrubbing with a Brillo pad, the only way I know to get rid of them is with an oven cleaner such as Easy-Off.
Carl Eppig
Our Maine man
4149
Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:38 pm
Middleton, NH, USA
Doug Surplus wrote:Some of the Calphalon and Cuisinart non-stick cookware can go in the oven (up to 500 degrees). I've not used either of mine like that yet, as I'm used to using the Le Creuset fry pan for searing, then finishing in the oven.
Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:Mark Lipton wrote:Can you transfer the nonsticks to the oven? That's one of the big reasons why I use stainless steel for the most part (nonsticks for frying, though).
I don't know. Is there any reason why not? (I guess I don't cook like that much.)
I use Easy-Off to clean the drip trays under the stove-top burners. There is gunk that even Easy-Off can't budge.
I also noticed that the most recent batch of Easy-Off isn't made with sodium hydroxide but with ethanolamine. I'm not sure what that is but I bet it's less toxic and I know it's less effective.
Mark Lipton wrote:Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:I use Easy-Off to clean the drip trays under the stove-top burners. There is gunk that even Easy-Off can't budge.
And that's what Brillo pads are for
Hmmm... interesting. Ethanolamine is essential less smelly ammonia and not nearly as caustic as lye (sodium hydroxide). I'd have my doubts if it will do as good a job. As to the toxicity of lye: it isn't. It is, however, very caustic so does lots of damage to skin and mucous membranes that it may be exposed to. I can imagine that product liability concerns motivated this change.
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8187
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
Mark Lipton wrote:Hmmm... interesting. Ethanolamine is essential less smelly ammonia and not nearly as caustic as lye (sodium hydroxide). I'd have my doubts if it will do as good a job. As to the toxicity of lye: it isn't. It is, however, very caustic so does lots of damage to skin and mucous membranes that it may be exposed to. I can imagine that product liability concerns motivated this change.
Mark Lipton
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43595
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Mike Filigenzi wrote:I tried the "fume-free" version of Easy Off that uses ethanolamine and found it to be a very poor substitute for the lye-based version. Not quite worthless, but very close.
Bill Spohn
He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'
9973
Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm
Vancouver BC
Jenise wrote:Two words: Krud Kutter.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 1 guest