Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Carl Eppig
Our Maine man
4149
Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:38 pm
Middleton, NH, USA
Howie Hart
The Hart of Buffalo
6389
Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:13 pm
Niagara Falls, NY
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Celia wrote:The beans sound great, and I love the story about the man with the average phone number!
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Howie Hart wrote:Very interesting concept and they do sound good. Any leftovers? They're great for breakfast.
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Ian H wrote:Fascinating!!! As it happens I did a similar sort of thing between two recipes by two very fine cooks I know/knew. Sadly John Hartman has passed away, but his Indianapolis baked beans was one of the parents, and Dave Sacerdote's Boston Baked beans was the other. Because I'm a terrible pedant, I asked a local potter to throw me a proper bean pot, as Dave was adamant that this was an important element in allowing the beans to cook properly without drying out too much. I've done it a few times, and adore it - though it's a bit on the rich side for a mere European.
If you're interested the recipe I built is here http://pagesperso-orange.fr/souvigne/recipes/side230.htm
From reading what you did, there aren't too many differences, but then - I'd not expect there to be. Dave's use of ginger is interesting. His original recipe seemed to use more, but he's made a typo and the first time I made the recipe, I nearly blew my head off with the gingeriness.
I hoped to be able to triumphantly cut and paste a picture from somewhere to show you, but the great majority of bean post pictures are of Le Creuset pots, which are similar but not identical. Your image is not bad. Three conical legs on the bottom of an almost spherical pot. Instead of flaring evenly out as the Le Creuset ones do, the top aperture is relatively small, about 3" tall and cylindrical. The pot is lidded. So the surface area from which evaporation can take place is strictly limited, and that, together with the earthenware, tends to reduce the need to replenish the water. Clever. Mine has only one single handle, but obviously that doesn't make a functional difference to the cooking - merely makes it harderJenise wrote:Educate me: what did Dave consider a proper bean pot? I have this cartoonish image in my head of a large round-shaped pot about as wide as it is tall with a narrow top opening, but I haven't a clue where I got that idea from.
to take out of the oven!Jenise wrote:I'm especially interested in the fact that your beans didn't start out thoroughly cooked, which I instinctively held off doing too.
Carrie L.
Golfball Gourmet
2476
Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:12 am
Extreme Southwest & Extreme Northeast
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Carrie L. wrote:Totally cool concept! Now you need to do it with all of the chili recipes on here!
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Ian H wrote: Three conical legs on the bottom of an almost spherical pot. Instead of flaring evenly out as the Le Creuset ones do, the top aperture is relatively small, about 3" tall and cylindrical. The pot is lidded. So the surface area from which evaporation can take place is strictly limited, and that, together with the earthenware, tends to reduce the need to replenish the water.
The thing is, that the beans will receive a pretty long cooking when they are being baked, so even if some of the other ingredients tend to keep them from completely falling to a mush, they will get tender.
Jenise wrote:Carrie L. wrote:Totally cool concept! Now you need to do it with all of the chili recipes on here!
With our without beans?
Carrie L.
Golfball Gourmet
2476
Thu Oct 12, 2006 8:12 am
Extreme Southwest & Extreme Northeast
Jenise wrote:Carrie L. wrote:Totally cool concept! Now you need to do it with all of the chili recipes on here!
With our without beans?
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Carrie L. wrote:Jenise wrote:Carrie L. wrote:Totally cool concept! Now you need to do it with all of the chili recipes on here!
With our without beans?
The AVERAGE amount of beans.
Peter May
Pinotage Advocate
3905
Mon Mar 20, 2006 11:24 am
Snorbens, England
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, DotBot and 0 guests