David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
34940
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
34940
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8187
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
Paul Winalski
Wok Wielder
8496
Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm
Merrimack, New Hampshire
John Tomasso wrote:I sometimes do that too, Mike. I lay the parts out on a sheet pan and use high heat. They really crisp up nicely that way.
Of course, I shouldn't be eating chicken skin, but........
This is more Mark Lipton's or Frank Deis's professional domain. But here's background on poultry fats that's long been public, yet gets inadequate play IMO. I raise it because today's habit of seeing fats as undesirable obscures important differences, and even essential nutrients in some of them. Case in point: Poultry fats.
Though they come from animals, poultry fats chemically resemble olive oil. Both have components liquid at room temperatures, partly or completely solid when refrigerated. In both, principal fat constituents are monounsaturated and the dominant fatty acid is oleic. Further, according to Enig's food-lipids book, chicken fat is a source of the "antimicrobial" palmitoleic acid, considered essential for the human immune system (olive oil is strong in natural preservatives, including tocopherols, making it slow to go rancid, but also important as human dietary antioxidants). Below is a comparison (numbers vary with the nutrients taken in by the olives and the chickens).
Principal fatty-acid and tocopherol ("vitamin E" antioxidant) components:
Olive oil 14% palmitic, 71% oleic, 10% linoleic; tocopherols 126 mg/kg
Chicken fat 23% palmitic, 42% oleic, 19% linoleic; tocopherols 28 mg/kg
This suggests you could do worse than cooking with a moderate amount of natural fat rendered from chicken. (I have an ironic image of people carefully discarding chicken fat, and at the same time taking expensive dietary supplements with similar content. Like the old parody of someone replacing a manual lawn mower with a powered version that carries them around on a seat, then having to buy an exercise machine to make up for the formerly inherent work-out. Actually used in a chapter of a rigorous engineering textbook, warning about frivolous or cynical consumer technology that merely takes people's money without serving their needs.)
ChefJCarey
Wine guru
4508
Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:06 pm
Noir Side of the Moon
Paul Winalski wrote:
I think a lot has to do with the quality of the chicken itself.
.
ChefJCarey
Wine guru
4508
Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:06 pm
Noir Side of the Moon
Paul Winalski
Wok Wielder
8496
Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm
Merrimack, New Hampshire
Paul Winalski wrote:IMO the bugaboo with chicken fat is with hormone-treated capons. Steroid hormones are fat-soluble and tend to concentrate in the bird's fat. Chicken skin enters the picture because chickens, like all warm-blooded animals, have a layer of insulating fat just under the skin.
If you avoid hormone-treated fowl, I don't see where chicken fat is any more or less healthy than any other sort of saturated animal fat.
ChefJCarey
Wine guru
4508
Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:06 pm
Noir Side of the Moon
Paul Winalski
Wok Wielder
8496
Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm
Merrimack, New Hampshire
Mark Lipton wrote: In addition to steroid hormones being fat-soluble, the antibiotic monensin (used to battle endemic salmonella in chicken farms) is too. If you recall Frank Perdue's famous exhortation about his product's "healthy yellow color," the bitter irony is that the yellow color of the chicken comes (in part) from the yellow monensin in their diet. I always got a kick out of Perdue's hype, as it only works on folks who've never dealt with live chickens.
Mark Lipton
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests