Shel T
Durable Bon Vivant
1748
Sun Jul 27, 2008 7:56 pm
20 miles from the nearest tsunami
Cynthia Wenslow
Pizza Princess
5746
Mon Mar 27, 2006 9:32 pm
The Third Coast
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8187
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
ChefJCarey
Wine guru
4508
Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:06 pm
Noir Side of the Moon
Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
ChefJCarey wrote:It's my conviction that convection of any concoction - and I would spout this at any convocation - is superior to plain old conduction. (It cooks faster and more evenly). Of course a concordance of the two is best.
Howie Hart
The Hart of Buffalo
6389
Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:13 pm
Niagara Falls, NY
How convenient.ChefJCarey wrote:It's my conviction that convection of any concoction - and I would spout this at any convocation - is superior to plain old conduction. (It cooks faster and more evenly). Of course a concordance of the two is best.
Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:The oven manual says, for baking, to lower temp by 25F, but for roasting to leave temp as-is and reduce time by 25%-30%. As several of you speak well of it, I'll have to give it a try.
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8187
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
Mark Lipton wrote:Jeff,
Convection does reduce cooking time/temperature for the reasons cited above. I don't use convection for things like souffles and cassoulet, where I am concerned about disturbing the cooking surface, but it's great for things that you want browned. Our 4 year old loves the tater tots that I cook by convection, for instance, and roasting anything is great in convection. I would be interested to hear from our baking contingent how breads do in convection ovens. I'd suspect that it'd improve the crust, but they may not rise quite as much?
Mark Lipton
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 2 guests