Gary Barlettano
Pappone di Vino
1909
Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:50 pm
In a gallon jug far, far away ...
Thomas wrote:Why do (some) vegetarians want to eat products which resemble dead animal stuff?
Stuart Yaniger wrote:FWIW, The Other Stupid, who is very much NOT a vegetarian, quite enjoys some of the analog products, but with the proviso that we don't refer to it as "vegetarian chicken." It's just different and a yummy product on its own, as long as one is using flavor and texture as the yardstick
Stuart Yaniger wrote:Thing that gives vegetarianism a bad name is vegetarians. Most of them are Puritans at heart and either don't like food or don't want to like food. Vegans are the worst that way.
When I'm traveling and someone offers to take me to a "vegetarian restaurant," I smile politely and try to figure out how to worm my way out of it. The NYT article this week was somewhat amusing- by far, the best vegetarian food found in San Francisco is at "normal" restaurants, not those pricey, pretentious Earthmuffin places that the Times reviewed.
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8187
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
Stuart Yaniger wrote:
But really, many vegetarians have chosen that path not because they think that meat tastes horrible or that they don't want chewy protein'n'fat goodness, but because they don't want that at the expense of a dead pig. It would be interesting to have a vegetarian analog of "long pork."
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43588
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Robert J.
Wine guru
2949
Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:36 pm
Coming to a store near you.
Stuart Yaniger wrote:In the case of the dish that prompted Thomas, I used a product called "Caviart," which provides the color of salmon roe, a nice, fishy sort of saltiness, and an interesting texture which I'm told is a pretty good approximation of salmon roe. But no salmon with slit-open bellies. And the Caviart made it into a better dish.
Robert J. wrote:"If God didn't want us to eat animals, then why did he make them out of meat?" - Steven Wright (I think).
rwj
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8187
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
celia wrote:Stuart Yaniger wrote:
Stu, in no way passing any comment on your choices, I did however see a food program recently on salmon roe coming out of Tasmania. The salmon aren't actually killed for their roe - quite the opposite in fact - the fish are sedated first, then "milked" for their roe, and then returned to the fish farm. The milking process is fascinating, they basically squeeze the salmon bellies and all the roe comes squirting out. The fish is unharmed by the process, and in fact if they aren't "milked", they can die because they're in an enclosed environment and are unable to spawn.
Here's the link...salmon roe
Ok, the fish does eventually get eaten though...
I can't quite imagine being a lifer like Rahsaan or Stuart and thinking "hmmm...how about tofu hot dogs tonight?"
the fish are sedated first, then "milked"
Gary Barlettano
Pappone di Vino
1909
Wed Mar 29, 2006 5:50 pm
In a gallon jug far, far away ...
Stuart Yaniger wrote:Morningstar Farms' burgers and TVP ground meat analog ...
celia wrote:Robert J. wrote:"If God didn't want us to eat animals, then why did he make them out of meat?" - Steven Wright (I think).
rwj
Really ? I thought it was Doug Surplus...
Stuart Yaniger wrote:Which response do you mean, Rahsaan?
ChefJCarey
Wine guru
4508
Sat Mar 10, 2007 8:06 pm
Noir Side of the Moon
Robert Reynolds
1000th member!
3577
Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:52 pm
Sapulpa, OK
Stuart Yaniger wrote:Which response do you mean, Rahsaan?
(fwiw, I'm pretty much a lifer- haven't eaten meat since I was a small kid)
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 0 guests