Jenise wrote:[...he is apparently hard of hearing so he put her on speaker phone which...he still held it to his ear...
No wonder he's hard of hearing!
Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Jon Peterson
The Court Winer
2981
Sat Apr 08, 2006 5:53 pm
The Blue Crab State
Jenise wrote:[...he is apparently hard of hearing so he put her on speaker phone which...he still held it to his ear...
Jo Ann Henderson
Mealtime Maven
3990
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:34 am
Seattle, WA USA
Jenise wrote:Jo Ann Henderson wrote:I would not have been able to hold it together, Jenise. Since they were your guest (and you were not theirs
Actually, we were both the guests of the third couple and it was her birthday, so I had to contain myself. However the birthday girl was also quite appalled, so we openly discussed how rude the other couple was being (considering the wife equally guilty, as she did nothing to put a stop to it) and made "Can you believe THIS?" faces. The conversation lasted an astonishing six-seven minutes.
Phone Boy did end up popping for the entire meal, though, which was quite generous.
Redwinger wrote:I agree with Joseph. Most of my annoyances are attributable to my fellow diners. You know, cell phone, boatloads of cologne, load talking, people who are overly needy of the servers time to the point where my service has to suffer, drunks, ...you get the idea.
The other "house" related annoyances are valid, but I feel I have some control over most of that either through politely communicating my displeasure or not returning to restaurants that consistently annoy me.
Redwinger
Wine guru
4038
Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:36 pm
Way Down South In Indiana, USA
Robin Garr wrote:Redwinger wrote:I agree with Joseph. Most of my annoyances are attributable to my fellow diners. You know, cell phone, boatloads of cologne, load talking, people who are overly needy of the servers time to the point where my service has to suffer, drunks, ...you get the idea.
The other "house" related annoyances are valid, but I feel I have some control over most of that either through politely communicating my displeasure or not returning to restaurants that consistently annoy me.
You guys could just reserve the entire restaurant for your party and enjoy a quiet evening. With sufficient money, anything is possible.
Redwinger wrote: if I had your $$$.
Jenise wrote:Bernard Roth wrote:Cell phones and loud mouths.
Okay, so I have a new one for you. Last night we dined with good friends at a high end white table cloth steakhouse, and the third couple was a couple visiting from Alaska. Who have a daughter in southern California, who called during dinner just to say hello. Jules not only took the call, he is apparently hard of hearing so he put her on speaker phone which though he still held it to his ear we could hear every mundane, boring word of. GRRRRRRRRRR.
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Redwinger wrote:Jenise wrote:ChefJCarey wrote:Diners.
It's a good thing you got out of the business.
I agree with Joseph. Most of my annoyances are attributable to my fellow diners. You know, cell phone, boatloads of cologne, load talking, people who are overly needy of the servers time to the point where my service has to suffer, drunks, ...you get the idea.
The other "house" related annoyances are valid, but I feel I have some control over most of that either through politely communicating my displeasure or not returning to restaurants that consistently annoy me.
Redwinger
Paul Winalski
Wok Wielder
8497
Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm
Merrimack, New Hampshire
Bernard Roth wrote:The proper thing to do if you need to be able to take a call while at dinner is:
1. Put the phone on VIBRATE.
2. Take your call outside the dining room. Go to the WC or outside.
Jo Ann Henderson
Mealtime Maven
3990
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:34 am
Seattle, WA USA
Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:Generally agree, Paul, but here's a (paranoid?) case for it: I have a 79-year-old father. Uses a duffel bag for a pillbox. Something might happen at any time, you know.
Jo Ann Henderson wrote:"so that you can do what?" Just wondering.
Jo Ann Henderson
Mealtime Maven
3990
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:34 am
Seattle, WA USA
Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:Jo Ann Henderson wrote:"so that you can do what?" Just wondering.
Get to the hospital and start managing the Medical Care process.
Call the cardiologist to make sure he's in the loop.
Call the other people who care.
Go to his place and get his pj's, his glasses, his slippers.
Carl Eppig
Our Maine man
4149
Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:38 pm
Middleton, NH, USA
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Bernard Roth wrote:The proper thing to do if you need to be able to take a call while at dinner is:
1. Put the phone on VIBRATE.
2. Take your call outside the dining room. Go to the WC or outside.
Jenise wrote:That's exactly right; there are polite alternatives.
Jo Ann Henderson
Mealtime Maven
3990
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:34 am
Seattle, WA USA
Robin Garr wrote:Jenise wrote:That's exactly right; there are polite alternatives.
Agreed. I would also add that it makes sense to object to people talking on cellphones at a sufficient volume to distract neighbors. This isn't really about the cellphone, though. It falls under the broader rule of "Don't be loud, don't be obnoxious."
But I'm having a hard time figuring why anyone would really care if a stranger at another table takes a cellphone call quietly, at the level of normal conversation. If the noise doesn't bother you, being upset at the mere fact that he's doing it seems awfully judgmental to me.
Jo Ann Henderson wrote:Sooner than you otherwise would be able to, I'm imagining. Because, once I'm contacted by the immediate, first responders, I do all of those things too. Even without a cell phone.
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Redwinger
Wine guru
4038
Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:36 pm
Way Down South In Indiana, USA
Robin Garr wrote:Agreed. I would also add that it makes sense to object to people talking on cellphones at a sufficient volume to distract neighbors.
Redwinger wrote: My guess is that 90%+ of people just talk too loadly on cells.
Much like when people complain about children in fine dining. It's not all children, just those that misbehave. We keep getting back to basic manners and respect for others.
BP
Jenise wrote:Karen, the terminology about memo probably didn't imply that it would go to each individual person on the staff, it's probably more a euphemism for what happens when the office/manager/owner brings matters to the attention of the "front-of-house" persons. And in the end things change or they don't--all you care about is the results, right?
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Karen/NoCA wrote:
I will be distributing your comments a general and anonymous memo to all staff.
Jo Ann Henderson
Mealtime Maven
3990
Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:34 am
Seattle, WA USA
Jeff Grossman/NYC wrote:Jo Ann Henderson wrote:Sooner than you otherwise would be able to, I'm imagining. Because, once I'm contacted by the immediate, first responders, I do all of those things too. Even without a cell phone.
Pay phones are becoming scarce.
Jeff Grossman said:
Get to the hospital and start managing the Medical Care process.
Call the cardiologist to make sure he's in the loop.
Call the other people who care.
Go to his place and get his pj's, his glasses, his slippers.
Users browsing this forum: ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest