Everything about food, from matching food and wine to recipes, techniques and trends.

1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Tom Troiano » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:30 am

In Massachusetts its illegal to sell to one customer for one price and another (with the card) for less so they are required to give you the card price if you say "I forgot my card". They always have a card at the cash register that they will scan for you if you ask so that you get the sale price.

That said, I often use a card and, quite frankly, I could care less that they know what I buy.
Tom T.
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Bob Henrick » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:38 am

Tom Troiano wrote:In Massachusetts its illegal to sell to one customer for one price and another (with the card) for less so they are required to give you the card price if you say "I forgot my card". They always have a card at the cash register that they will scan for you if you ask so that you get the sale price.

That said, I often use a card and, quite frankly, I could care less that they know what I buy.


Tom, you may be 100% correct about being able to say "I forgot" and perhaps I will try that sometime just to check it out. In the meantime, it implies that I have a card, and if enough retailers require "the card" one might have to start carrying a large purse just to hold all the cards one might need just to shop. :-) Maybe, I am out in left field, and inconsistent in that I don't see a problem with a senior citizen discount?

Addendum: Tom, I checked the Kroger store FAQ page, and they do not have a card at the register for those who might have left their card at home, or heaven forbid in the ignition of their vehicle. If you keep your receipt though, you can bring it the next time you shop and get the discount. Below is taken directly from the Kroger FAQ.

Why can’t the cashier scan a card for me if I forget my Kroger Plus Card?

Card integrity is very important to us and scanning a card that has not been issued to an individual would compromise that integrity. If you forget your card, you can enter the phone number you provided when you applied for your current shopper card (area code + 7 digits). This number is your personal pin linked to your Kroger Plus Card number. If this does not work, save your receipt which shows what you could have saved. Next time you come in with your Kroger Plus Card, visit the service desk for a refund of the savings amount. Also, give the service desk associate your current card ID and home phone number. He or she can contact the regional loyalty department to activate your personal pin for your next visit.
Last edited by Bob Henrick on Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bob Henrick
no avatar
User

Dave R

Rank

On Time Out status

Posts

1924

Joined

Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Dave R » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:52 am

Bob Henrick wrote:
Dave R wrote:I could not possibly care less if the grocery store knows/tracks what I am buying. But then again I am not buying jug wine or cheap beer so I have nothing to hide.


Dave, It seems that no one is grasping the fact that my biggest complaint to the "card" is that one must have the "card" in order to get the "sale" price.


I understood that Bob and that is why I did not direct my comment toward you.

What's your take on coupons? Should one be able to get the coupon adjusted price even though they do not have the coupon?
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up words and phrases and clauses.
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up cars and making 'em function.
no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Tom Troiano » Wed Jun 10, 2009 10:53 am

Bob,

Good point about Senior Citizen discounts. Of course those exist in MA. In fact, quasi governmental authorities like the MBTA (mass transit) give Senior Citizen discounts. Perhaps what I read was wrong or perhaps its that if you have beef tips and Diet Coke on sale that you have to give everyone the sale price regardless of whether they have a card.
Tom T.
no avatar
User

Larry Greenly

Rank

Resident Chile Head

Posts

7036

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:37 am

Location

Albuquerque, NM

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Larry Greenly » Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:02 pm

Dave R wrote:I could not possibly care less if the grocery store knows/tracks what I am buying. But then again I am not buying jug wine or cheap beer so I have nothing to hide.


That sounds very much like the argument about wiretapping: "I'm not saying anything wrong on the phone, so what do I care?"

And, Bob, I understand your argument. I resent the card on several levels. The leverage is not unlike the feds telling states what do to do regarding something or they'll withhold highway monies.
no avatar
User

Dave R

Rank

On Time Out status

Posts

1924

Joined

Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Dave R » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:07 pm

That sounds very much like the argument about wiretapping: "I'm not saying anything wrong on the phone, so what do I care?"


Bad analogy, Larry. If the Administration wants to tap your phone you don't have a choice. If you do not want to shop at a grocery store that asks that you present a card to get a discount you can go somewhere else, right? No one is forcing you to apply for the card, use the card or even shop at a store that offers a card.
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up words and phrases and clauses.
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up cars and making 'em function.
no avatar
User

Larry Greenly

Rank

Resident Chile Head

Posts

7036

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:37 am

Location

Albuquerque, NM

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Larry Greenly » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:15 pm

Perhaps. But I still have a low level resentment about someone spying on me. Can I borrow your card to make my purchases? :mrgreen:
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Bob Henrick » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:52 pm

Dave R wrote:I understood that Bob and that is why I did not direct my comment toward you.

What's your take on coupons? Should one be able to get the coupon adjusted price even though they do not have the coupon?


Dave, as I understand the difference between the card and the coupon is that if I want the sale price then I have to get their card. They can then use that card to track my purchases, and they then have the ability to sell that information to other parties. (I know that "the card" is not the only way this is done) but the card way is probably the sneakiest way of going about it. They say if you have our card, you can buy our "on sale" products at the sale price, but if you don't you must pay the regular price, therefore enticing people to give them this opportunity for a few cents off on a product.

If I want to shop using coupons, I don't have to tell the store, nor the company issuing the coupon any of my information, and the coupon price is available for anyone clipping the coupon. Again, no information is disclosed, I just get the reduced price.

I also understand that the big box stores like Costco and Sam's club does essentially the same thing and we pay for the privilege. I understand it, but I do have a problem with it. At least at Sam's (I don't have a local Costco) I get unadulterated four legged animal meat. Poultry is another case though as they sell Tyson chicken and AFAIK, all Tyson chicken products (other than organ meat) is enhanced with up to 15% "real chicken broth"! I do not buy chicken that has this disclaimer any more than I buy pork or beef, or lamb, or veal that has the notice.
Last edited by Bob Henrick on Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Bob Henrick
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21716

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Robin Garr » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:56 pm

Seems simple to me, Bob: Kroger "pays" you for agreeing to have your purchases tracked by offering you sale prices that others don't get. It's a quid pro quo situation, and no one is discriminated against because anyone willing to participate can have a card for the asking. Moreover, your discounts tend to be based on your buying patterns. Buy a lot of cat food, get a lot of cat food coupons. It actually makes quite a bit of sense.

It strikes me that there are an awful lot of things more worth getting one's knickers in a wad over than this.

Bob Henrick wrote:
Dave R wrote:I could not possibly care less if the grocery store knows/tracks what I am buying. But then again I am not buying jug wine or cheap beer so I have nothing to hide.


Dave, It seems that no one is grasping the fact that my biggest complaint to the "card" is that one must have the "card" in order to get the "sale" price. An item either has a one for all price, or it should have, or this is a form of discrimination. It also is a form of data gathering that is, or could become, rather intrusive. I am not trying to hide what I am buying, contrary to an impression I might have somehow given.
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Bob Henrick » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:18 pm

Larry Greenly wrote:Perhaps. But I still have a low level resentment about someone spying on me. Can I borrow your card to make my purchases? :mrgreen:


Larry, if Dave lets you use his card, buy some cheap jug wine and a case of really cheap beer, maybe some Milwaukee's Best . you don't have to drink it," just buy it, and then he is there"! :-) :twisted:
Bob Henrick
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Bob Henrick » Wed Jun 10, 2009 2:36 pm

Robin Garr wrote:Seems simple to me, Bob: Kroger "pays" you for agreeing to have your purchases tracked by offering you sale prices that others don't get. It's a quid pro quo situation, and no one is discriminated against because anyone willing to participate can have a card for the asking. Moreover, your discounts tend to be based on your buying patterns. Buy a lot of cat food, get a lot of cat food coupons. It actually makes quite a bit of sense.

It strikes me that there are an awful lot of things more worth getting one's knickers in a wad over than this.


Robin, it strikes me that one can pick and choose over what they get their knickers in a wad over. And while I do not agree that my knickers are in a wad, this is IMO a subject worth giving my $0.02 worth. And even worth replying to forum members who reply to my posts on the subject.
Bob Henrick
no avatar
User

Paul Winalski

Rank

Wok Wielder

Posts

8497

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm

Location

Merrimack, New Hampshire

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Paul Winalski » Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:32 pm

Bob Henrick wrote:[Why can’t the cashier scan a card for me if I forget my Kroger Plus Card?

Card integrity is very important to us and scanning a card that has not been issued to an individual would compromise that integrity.


In other words, the information collected on purchases is worthless to Kroger's real customers (the marketing outfits who buy your personal purchasing information) unless it's accurate.

As Robin said, it's a quid pro quo situation. Kroger pays you (via merchandise discounts) to collect information on your shopping patterns, which Kroger then sells on to whoever out there wants to buy it. Personally, I don't need any more unsolicited junk mail, so I want no part of this scheme.

-Paul W.
no avatar
User

Larry Greenly

Rank

Resident Chile Head

Posts

7036

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:37 am

Location

Albuquerque, NM

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Larry Greenly » Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:21 pm

Bob Henrick wrote:
Larry Greenly wrote:Perhaps. But I still have a low level resentment about someone spying on me. Can I borrow your card to make my purchases? :mrgreen:


Larry, if Dave lets you use his card, buy some cheap jug wine and a case of really cheap beer, maybe some Milwaukee's Best . you don't have to drink it," just buy it, and then he is there"! :-) :twisted:


I was considering buying Depends.
no avatar
User

Robert Reynolds

Rank

1000th member!

Posts

3577

Joined

Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:52 pm

Location

Sapulpa, OK

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Robert Reynolds » Wed Jun 10, 2009 7:45 pm

Larry Greenly wrote:
Bob Henrick wrote:
Larry Greenly wrote:Perhaps. But I still have a low level resentment about someone spying on me. Can I borrow your card to make my purchases? :mrgreen:


Larry, if Dave lets you use his card, buy some cheap jug wine and a case of really cheap beer, maybe some Milwaukee's Best . you don't have to drink it," just buy it, and then he is there"! :-) :twisted:


I was considering buying Depends.

Might as well add in some Preparation H. :lol:
ΜΟΛ'ΩΝ ΛΑΒ'Ε
no avatar
User

Fred Sipe

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

444

Joined

Thu Jul 13, 2006 11:34 am

Location

Sunless Rust-Belt NE Ohio

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Fred Sipe » Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:23 pm

For all of us cardholders:

http://www.justoneclubcard.com/

Just carry one card with up to 8 scanable barcodes!
no avatar
User

Larry Greenly

Rank

Resident Chile Head

Posts

7036

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:37 am

Location

Albuquerque, NM

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Larry Greenly » Thu Jun 11, 2009 9:38 am

That is another problem. So many stores have cards of some sort, my wallet is looking like George Costanza's.
no avatar
User

Dave R

Rank

On Time Out status

Posts

1924

Joined

Sun Jan 27, 2008 3:07 pm

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Dave R » Thu Jun 11, 2009 2:29 pm

Bob Henrick wrote:
Larry Greenly wrote:Perhaps. But I still have a low level resentment about someone spying on me. Can I borrow your card to make my purchases? :mrgreen:


Larry, if Dave lets you use his card, buy some cheap jug wine and a case of really cheap beer, maybe some Milwaukee's Best . you don't have to drink it," just buy it, and then he is there"! :-) :twisted:


Be careful what you wish for, Bob. When I applied for the card they did not ask to see any type of ID so I filled out the application and used your name. If Larry uses the card as you suggest, it is you who will end up on the plonk wine/skunk beer Watch List. :)
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up words and phrases and clauses.
Conjunction Junction, what's your function?
Hooking up cars and making 'em function.
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Bob Henrick » Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:52 pm

Dave R wrote:Be careful what you wish for, Bob. When I applied for the card they did not ask to see any type of ID so I filled out the application and used your name. If Larry uses the card as you suggest, it is you who will end up on the plonk wine/skunk beer Watch List. :)


Ok Dave, I will now have to get the CSI to investigate and discover where my application was tendered. I have never been in Chicago (except for passing through O'Hare) in my life! Funny thing though, on that trip my seat mate was a woman of a certain age, who was snockered when she boarded in Cincinnati, AND she was a Kroger employee! :-)
Bob Henrick
no avatar
User

GeoCWeyer

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

839

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:24 pm

Location

WoodburyMN

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by GeoCWeyer » Thu Jul 09, 2009 8:05 pm

Besides the solution it could also be in the 70's you were purchasing 80-20 or better. You probably purchased 70-30 this time. That would also make a difference.
I love the life I live and live the life I love*, and as Mark Twain said, " Always do well it will gratify the few and astonish the rest".

*old blues refrain
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43596

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Jenise » Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:00 pm

Bob H--anyone can apply and receive the card on the spot, so there's no discrimination involved. Have one or don't, but you have to give a little to get a little. But let me jump tracks: you're always going on about Sam's club. They require a card, don't they? You don't seem to have a problem with that.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Bob Henrick » Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:25 pm

Jenise wrote:Bob H--anyone can apply and receive the card on the spot, so there's no discrimination involved. Have one or don't, but you have to give a little to get a little. But let me jump tracks: you're always going on about Sam's club. They require a card, don't they? You don't seem to have a problem with that.


Jenise, Sam's club is a membership club, Kroger is not. Sam's club will sell to anyone who is a member at a given price and the price is not different to some than to others. If I want to pay the membership price, and shop Sam's, I do so, if I do not, I don't. Sam's makes no pretense of being your neighborhood grocer. If Kroger wanted to become a club type store, I would have no problem with their car requirement either.I do agree that any store that requires a card to get the best price is using the card as a tracking device, and in my opinion that is a bit invasive. I suspect though that I am wasting effort in trying to get anyone to understand my position, even though it is simply that in a normal retail store the price should be the same to all shoppers in that store. Kroger is IMO a normal retail store, Sam's is not.
Bob Henrick
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43596

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Jenise » Fri Jul 10, 2009 11:11 am

You don't think Sam's is tracking your purchases? It's not invasive when it's mandatory then, but it is when it's voluntary?
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

GeoCWeyer

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

839

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 4:24 pm

Location

WoodburyMN

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by GeoCWeyer » Fri Jul 10, 2009 12:13 pm

My wife and I pay for most things using our credit cards. That makes tracking of our purchases made at one location or chain very easy to track. If all the items are scanned it is hard to believe that they aren't tracked for "marketing" purposes. This information can assist the business in stocking, advertising and others ways.

The main credit card we use separates the purchases into groups and gives us a composite anytime we wish to look it up online. This is can have both positive and negative repercussions. It makes it easy for my wife to track my wine purchases.
I love the life I live and live the life I love*, and as Mark Twain said, " Always do well it will gratify the few and astonish the rest".

*old blues refrain
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: 1 lb. of hamburger in the 70's versus 1 lb. of hamburger now

by Bob Henrick » Fri Jul 10, 2009 3:13 pm

Jenise wrote:You don't think Sam's is tracking your purchases? It's not invasive when it's mandatory then, but it is when it's voluntary?


Jenise, yo no habla ingles I suppose. I have said what my position is in this issue, and I do have a Kroger card, because I have no intention of screwing myself on "sale" items that I might need or want. I use the card (shop at Kroger) for sale items and not much else. But, of course if I go to Kroger to get the milk on sale and also need a loaf of bread I go ahead and get it because it would cost me more in gasoline to go on down the road to the next non-card store. I do it, but I do not like it. I like shopping at Sam's for their superior meats plus I can get other items as well priced as any where in town and usually for less. Yes Sam's does track my purchases, else they couldn't send me a mailing telling me how much I have saved over the past several months. Again, Sam's is a member club, and Kroger is a retail outlet open to anyone and everyone, and to sell to one for more (or less) than to another is just not (in my book) right. Also, if you scroll up the page to my reply to Dave R I thought I had made it pretty clear where I stand on outlets that require a card in a post dated Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:52. Anyway, I think it is time we let this thread die a natural and sudden death.
Bob Henrick
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon, ClaudeBot, Jeff Grossman and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign