Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Karen/NoCA wrote:Did anyone see her show today? She had first lady, Laura Bush as her guest. First of all, Rachael wears skin tight, stretch jeans, with a top that looks like a Target purchase and a clunky necklace, another Target purchase. I've seen her looking much better with lesser known guests.
She interrupted the first lady several times, and I noticed Laura shot her an evil look a time or two. Her worst mistake.....after asking Mrs. Bush what she was reading, Mrs. Bush mentioned something about a Canadian personality, and Rachael calls her a "name dropper"! Did I hear this right? Good grief. She did restrain herself at the end of the interview, and did not grab Mrs. Bush and hug her like she does the rest of her guests.
Hoke
Achieving Wine Immortality
11420
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am
Portland, OR
Thomas wrote:Karen/NoCA wrote:Did anyone see her show today? She had first lady, Laura Bush as her guest. First of all, Rachael wears skin tight, stretch jeans, with a top that looks like a Target purchase and a clunky necklace, another Target purchase. I've seen her looking much better with lesser known guests.
She interrupted the first lady several times, and I noticed Laura shot her an evil look a time or two. Her worst mistake.....after asking Mrs. Bush what she was reading, Mrs. Bush mentioned something about a Canadian personality, and Rachael calls her a "name dropper"! Did I hear this right? Good grief. She did restrain herself at the end of the interview, and did not grab Mrs. Bush and hug her like she does the rest of her guests.
What is Laura Bush doing on that show in the first place? I don't understand your rant.
Thomas wrote:Karen/NoCA wrote:Did anyone see her show today? She had first lady, Laura Bush as her guest. First of all, Rachael wears skin tight, stretch jeans, with a top that looks like a Target purchase and a clunky necklace, another Target purchase. I've seen her looking much better with lesser known guests.
She interrupted the first lady several times, and I noticed Laura shot her an evil look a time or two. Her worst mistake.....after asking Mrs. Bush what she was reading, Mrs. Bush mentioned something about a Canadian personality, and Rachael calls her a "name dropper"! Did I hear this right? Good grief. She did restrain herself at the end of the interview, and did not grab Mrs. Bush and hug her like she does the rest of her guests.
What is Laura Bush doing on that show in the first place? I don't understand your rant.
Larry Greenly
Resident Chile Head
7033
Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:37 am
Albuquerque, NM
Mike Filigenzi
Known for his fashionable hair
8187
Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm
Sacramento, CA
Randy Buckner wrote:Whether you agree with the politics or not, you should respect the office/position. It sounds like Ray did not do that, to her discredit.
Randy Buckner wrote:Whether you agree with the politics or not, you should respect the office/position. It sounds like Ray did not do that, to her discredit.
Hoke wrote:Thomas, you have to keep up with things. Rachael has a talk show now. She's not confined to the Foodie scene any longer.
Stuart Yaniger wrote:What office/position?
Larry Greenly
Resident Chile Head
7033
Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:37 am
Albuquerque, NM
Thomas wrote:Not to get political, but are the Bush people trying to seem nice all of a sudden by showing their teeth on TV?
What office/position? She wasn't elected to anything, there's no Constitutional or statutory mention of "First Lady" as a government office, and last I looked, we weren't a monarchy.
Hoke
Achieving Wine Immortality
11420
Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am
Portland, OR
Rahsaan wrote:Hoke wrote:Thomas, you have to keep up with things. Rachael has a talk show now. She's not confined to the Foodie scene any longer.
What is this talk show about? Food? Or is it one of those generic Life Issue late morning/afternoon shows?
Randy Buckner wrote:What office/position? She wasn't elected to anything, there's no Constitutional or statutory mention of "First Lady" as a government office, and last I looked, we weren't a monarchy.
She holds the position of First Lady and should be respected as such, all snide remarks from the peanut gallery aside. I am saddened at how cynical and disrespectful our society has become.
RichardAtkinson wrote:I agree. Apparently manners are thing of the past. Children, the media and certain age groups have either forgotten what they were taught...or were never taught to begin with.
She shouldn't be respected just because she is the First Lady, she should have been granted the respect due to her as a decent human being.
Richard
Robert J.
Wine guru
2949
Thu Nov 23, 2006 1:36 pm
Coming to a store near you.
Stuart Yaniger wrote:What office/position? She wasn't elected to anything, there's no Constitutional or statutory mention of "First Lady" as a government office, and last I looked, we weren't a monarchy. Yet.
Of the people, by the people, for the people: as has been said, no monarchy here. First lady is the President's wife, not much more than that, really. She didn't even have to earn the thing.
She shouldn't be respected just because she is the First Lady, she should have been granted the respect due to her as a decent human being.
Randy Buckner wrote:Of the people, by the people, for the people: as has been said, no monarchy here. First lady is the President's wife, not much more than that, really. She didn't even have to earn the thing.
So that is reason to disrespect her? It is what she represents, but you know that already. Even a person being put to death on death row deserves a certain amount of dignity. Being disrespectful seems to be a badge of honor to some people....
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 3 guests