Robert Reynolds
1000th member!
3577
Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:52 pm
Sapulpa, OK
Carl Eppig
Our Maine man
4149
Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:38 pm
Middleton, NH, USA
John Tomasso wrote:Robert, I have a GE range that I have been using for just under two years now.
I would not buy it again.
It has many features I like, and, in the big picture, it performs adequately. However, I find an annoying lack of control in one of the burners, and it happens to be the one I use most often.
My range is set up with a simmer burner at the right rear position, and a power burner at the right front position.
So my go to burner for saute work is the left front position. If I turn it too low, it goes out. If I try to goose it up a bit, it's too much. I can't find a sweet spot, and believe me, it's not for lack of trying.
It's enough of a defect to me that I could not recommend the product to anyone else.
John Tomasso wrote:Robert, I have a GE range that I have been using for just under two years now.
I would not buy it again.
Dave R wrote:Does GE actually still make GE ranges? I thought I had read in Welch's autobiography that the division was sold and another company makes the products but slaps the GE name on them.
Robert Reynolds wrote:First choice is the GE Monogram Professional 36", 6-burner cooktop. Says it will go from a 140 degree simmer to 18,000 BTUs on all six burners, plus the iron grates all reverse to make a wok stand.
Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
Dave R wrote:One thing to also consider...The photos you posted of the land look like you will be building in a rural area. Do you know if you will have natural gas or LP? I am not sure that all ranges and stoves can be converted to LP.
Robert Reynolds
1000th member!
3577
Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:52 pm
Sapulpa, OK
Robin Garr wrote:I think we may have that same range, John! White "glass" top?
Mark Willstatter wrote:
John, was this range from GE's Monogram line? It's important not to generalize across product lines. GE might make lousy dishwashers but good ovens; the Monogram line Robert is considering as I understand it is of completely differnet design and manufacture than other GE ranges.
Carl Eppig
Our Maine man
4149
Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:38 pm
Middleton, NH, USA
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Carl Eppig wrote:We have a five burner DCS that we love to pieces. Among other features it gives you a low simmer on all burners. The GEs I've seen only give you that on one.
Jenise
FLDG Dishwasher
43596
Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm
The Pacific Northest Westest
Mark Willstatter wrote: I believe their "Extra Low" (or whatever the trademark is) simmer is still achieved by stopping and starting the burner several times per minute. That means you get to hear the "crack" of the electronic ignition relighting the burner that often.
John Tomasso wrote:No Robin - this is a gas, with standard burners and metal grates. But it does sound as if we share the same frustration.
Robert Reynolds
1000th member!
3577
Fri Jun 08, 2007 11:52 pm
Sapulpa, OK
Robin Garr wrote: It's a Profile, too, and we belatedly found out that it's really intended to LOOK good in tract mansions where it's rarely used. (Our theory.)
Dave R wrote:Robin Garr wrote: It's a Profile, too, and we belatedly found out that it's really intended to LOOK good in tract mansions where it's rarely used. (Our theory.)
Ok, I'll ask...why would it be rarely used? Are they typically ripped out and replaced?
Larry Greenly
Resident Chile Head
7036
Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:37 am
Albuquerque, NM
John Tomasso wrote:
Fair point, and no, it is not a Monogram. It is a GE Profile. And as I said, while not completely dissatisfied with it, I don't love it, either.
If it were a wine, I'd give it 82 points on a good day. (assuming I used the 100 point scale to score wines, which I don't)
In Stuart speak, it would probably merit a Larry.
Larry Greenly wrote:
In Larry-speak, I'm deeply honored that I'm obviously residing in your gray matter and have been awarded a unit of measurement. I look forward to being in the next edition of the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics.
Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch and 2 guests