The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 2004 Murphy Goode 100% [?] Petit Verdot California; two bad CCs.

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Bob Ross

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

5703

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:39 pm

Location

Franklin Lakes, NJ

WTN: 2004 Murphy Goode 100% [?] Petit Verdot California; two bad CCs.

by Bob Ross » Sun Jul 08, 2007 4:35 pm

2004 Murphy Goode Petit Verdot River Road Alexander Valley California. $15 a glass at Endless Vines.

Deep red color, deep hue, intense fruit aroma with a bit of earth and spice, very smooth fruit tastes, good basis of earth with spice and mint notes, very smooth tannins, excellent balance, medium mouth feel, long finish with fruit, spice and earth notes. I'm not sure whether this is 100% Petit Verdot, but it was a very pleasant wine, one I'll certainly try again. I wonder how many wineries make a wine that is 100% or primarily Petit Verdot. 4*.

Notes: http://www.murphygoodewinery.com/

Winemaker notes: When we planted our Petit Verdot it was intended for blending purposes with our Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot programs; however, upon tasting it, we were so captivated we decided to produce a 100% Petit Verdot wine. Our Petit Verdot vines thrive on a rocky slope on Murphy Ranch and produce a fruit that is extraordinary. Avg. sugar at harvest - 25.5° brix. TA at bottling - 7.35 grams/liter. Alcohol at bottling - 14.5%. Bottling Date - August, 2006

The Wine Libary attributes this note to the winery, but there is nothing but the 100% Petit Verdot on the winery's website: "We planted four acres of Petit Verdot with the intent to use it exclusively for blending purposes with our Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot programs. During our blending trials of Bordeaux varietals, we tasted numerous blends and were captivated by the Petit Verdot and decided to not only use it for blending with the Cabernet and Merlot, but to produce a wine with Petit Verdot as the principal variety. Blended with a percentage of Merlot, this wine displays expressive black aromas that carry through the broad, succulent palate." -Winery

****

On another subject, we wanted to have Chianti with our homemade pizza last night but were disappointed:

2002 Villa Puccini Chianti Superiore Tuscany Italy. 12.5% alcohol. Dead on arrival; fruit, and only fruit, with no acidity or tannins. Cherry Kool Aid. 1*.

2001 Felsina Chianti Classico Reserva "Rancia" Tuscany Italy. Badly corked. 1*.

This was a bottle in the three case selection from Chambers Street put together by Lyle Fass for me. I had looked forward to the wine, based on Lyle's description:


13.5% alcohol. Chambers Street, $34.99. Absolutely my favorite CC out there. Needs age but the ones we have with age are a bit pricey…but these might eclipse the '85, '97 and '99 with some proper bottle age. 2001 is a classic vintage in Tuscany with wonderful acidity, freshness and depth of fruit. The 2001 Rancia can be drunk now but ideally I would open it 5-6 hours in advance and slowly let air in by breaking the neck a tad. This wine will open up into a forest floor, cherry/spice explosion off everything that is right with traditionally made Sangiovese.


Regards, Bob
no avatar
User

Nathan Smyth

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

258

Joined

Tue Dec 26, 2006 12:20 am

Re: WTN: 2004 Murphy Goode 100% [?] Petit Verdot California; two bad CCs.

by Nathan Smyth » Sun Jul 08, 2007 5:44 pm

I wonder how many wineries make a wine that is 100% or primarily Petit Verdot. 4*.

Dog Ridge, out of the McLaren Vale, makes at least three bottlings [regular, reserve, and a special "MVP"]:

http://www.dogridge.com.au/DogRidgeTastingNotes.htm

Just fantastic, world-class juice.
no avatar
User

Bob Ross

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

5703

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:39 pm

Location

Franklin Lakes, NJ

Re: WTN: 2004 Murphy Goode 100% [?] Petit Verdot California; two bad CCs.

by Bob Ross » Sun Jul 08, 2007 6:26 pm

Thanks, Nathan. I see only two North Carolin shops that offer the Dog Ridge -- I've had difficulty with shipping wine between North Carolina and New Jersey.

Do you know of a source?

Regards, Bob
no avatar
User

Bill Spencer

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

425

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:03 pm

Location

Yuma, Arizona

One that I know of

by Bill Spencer » Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:33 pm

Bob Ross wrote:I wonder how many wineries make a wine that is 100% or primarily Petit Verdot.


%^)

Castoro Cellars in Paso Robles ... if I remember correctly it is 100 percent Petite Verdot ... they have been making this wine for four years ... headed back there after a year next week and I always pick up a couple bottles ... inky black and is a killer with lamb ...

Clink !

%^)
"If there are no dogs in heaven, then when I die I want to go where they went !" - Anonymous

Napa is for auto parts, Paso is for wine !

Bill Spencer (Arizona Wine Lover)

Lemon Recipes - http://www.associatedcitrus.com/recipes.html
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

34951

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: One that I know of

by David M. Bueker » Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:43 pm

Petit Verdot is a real up and coming variety in Virginia. Several places make it 100%. Blenheim & Veritas are two I have tried and liked.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Nathan Smyth

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

258

Joined

Tue Dec 26, 2006 12:20 am

Re: WTN: 2004 Murphy Goode 100% [?] Petit Verdot California; two bad CCs.

by Nathan Smyth » Mon Jul 09, 2007 12:56 pm

PM

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot and 14 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign