by David M. Bueker » Tue May 29, 2007 8:06 am
Part 1 - Veritas
While visiting my parents in Virginia I was able to take a day to do some wine tasting around the Charlottesville area. I first tasted the wines of the area back in 1988, and while I didn’t have any idea what I was tasting back then, it was one of those experiences that started me down the road to serious interest in the wine hobby.
The most important thing that has happened over the last (nearly) 20 years is that there is no longer any question about the actual winemaking. While there were some wines I liked more than others, not once did I find any serious flaws that would render a wine undrinkable. That’s a far cry from 1988, and even from just a few years ago when there were more than a few badly flawed wines. Certainly some of that is producer specific. We went to three highly regarded wineries in the heart of Virginia wine country.
Our first stop was at Veritas, southwest of Charlottesville. My folks had been there many times, but this was my first visit. It’s a lovely space, rustic but refined. The wines weren’t bad either.
2006 Sauvignon Blanc – ($18, Alc. 12%) Melon and fresh cut grass on the nose. Melon and lemon fruit on the palate. Easy to drink, though I’m not a fan of grassy Sauv Blanc.
2005 Chardonnay Saddleback – ($18, Alc. 12.5%) An unwooded Chardonnay, this showed very nice, crisp apple and melon notes, but it had a very short finish.
2005 Chardonnay Harlequin Reserve – ($20, Alc. 14%) Creamy and spicy, with soft fruit notes. Not enough fruit to support the oak, though I bet this has fans.
2005 Viognier – ($20, Alc. 14%) Honeysuckle and peach aromas and flavors. The fruit is sweet, and the mouthfeel is quite light despite the 14% alcohol. Very nice. I tend to find quality Viognier in Virginia. Given the marginal climate I think it helps for them to be growing a grape without a grand tradition of 100% new oak aging. In most (though not all) Virginia Viognier I have tried the fruit is allowed to shine through, and so the overall lightness is not as obvious.
2006 Rosé of Cabernet Franc/Merlot – ($13, Alc. 12%) Buttery berries!? Lots of berries on the palate & just barely off dry. This is really quite delicious, but buttery?? No oak here, so I’m really confused.
2004 Claret (60% Cab Franc, 40% Merlot) – ($16, Alc. 13.5%) Distinctly green herbal, but not in an unpleasant way, more thyme and rosemary than anything more aggressive (e.g. green pepper). There’s bright cherry fruit, but it’s almost too subtle. Needs some stuffing.
2005 Vintner’s Reserve Red Wine (60% Cab Franc, 30% Merlot, 10% Petit Verdot) – ($25, Alc. 13%) Red fruit and leather on the nose. There’s good acidity here, as well as more substantial red fruit than in the Claret. This has a medium length finish. Well made red wine.
2005 Petit Verdot - ($29, Alc. 13.2%) The fruities wine of the bunch. Lots of black cherries here. The Petit Verdot must be where the Vintner’s Reserve Red gets its more substantial fruit. There’s also mint here, as well as a bit of toasty oak, but the fruit in this wine is strong enough to stand up and dominate the oak. Well balanced and interesting. I bought a bottle of this for the curiosity of 100% Petit Verdot, but also because it was just plain good wine.
2005 Petit Manseng - ($25, Alc. 13%, 1.5% Residual Sugar) Slightly thick texture, with crème brulee and underripe pineapple aromas and flavors. Not bad, but not all that substantial.
2005 ‘Kenmar’ (flash frozen Traminette) – ($18 for 375 ml, Alc. 14%, 8% Residual Sugar) Floral and peach aromas. Slightly confected. Bitter grapefruit peel on the finish. There’s good acid balance, but not enough fruit to cover that finishing bitterness.
All in all this is a very good lineup for a relatively new winery. Veritas is well ahead of Virginia wineries with a much longer track record. As has frequently been the case I find that Viognier and Cabernet Franc can make some nice wines, but the real surprise is the Petit Verdot. Given how hard it is to ripen in Bordeaux I’m basically shocked that anyone in Virginia can make a good wine out of it.
Another point in Veritas’ favor is that the prices are very reasonable. The Rosé is inexpensive enough to be a summer quaffer, and the Petit Verdot is reasonably priced for the quality (and rarity) of the wine. This restraint is not the case everywhere in Virginia. Aggressive pricing may be necessary to make some wineries financially viable, but it does them no commercial favor in an emerging region.
I do however have one rant. While the person who poured the wines for us was very nice, she insisted on giving the spiel about what we could taste in the wines, even after we made it very clear we were quite knowledgeable and wanted to form our own impressions. I’m standing there with pen and notebook, doing the whole critical swirl, sniff, spit thing, and getting the “don’t you taste chocolate?” line. No, as a matter of fact I do not taste chocolate. Please tell the group in the fancy jewelry and straw hats, who just pulled up in their Hummer what they taste in the wines. End of rant.
More to come in part 2.
Decisions are made by those who show up