The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 2001 Château Smith Haut Lafitte

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

34949

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

WTN: 2001 Château Smith Haut Lafitte

by David M. Bueker » Sat May 19, 2007 8:09 pm

2001 Château Smith Haut Lafitte - France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan (5/19/2007)
Chocolatey on the nose, but without going over the top. Dark black fruit, richness but also energy. This is ripe but also focused, and while its not showing much beyond primary right now, there's plenty of material there for development. The balance is very good, without any obvious heat or harsh woody notes. I like this, but it needs time to develop
no avatar
User

Brian K Miller

Rank

Passionate Arboisphile

Posts

9340

Joined

Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:05 am

Location

Northern California

Re: WTN: 2001 Château Smith Haut Lafitte

by Brian K Miller » Sat May 19, 2007 11:05 pm

One of my favorites over the last couple of years, David. Even as young as it is. There is just something about Bordeaux, overpriced as it may be.
...(Humans) are unique in our capacity to construct realities at utter odds with reality. Dogs dream and dolphins imagine, but only humans are deluded. –Jacob Bacharach
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

34949

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: 2001 Château Smith Haut Lafitte

by David M. Bueker » Sun May 20, 2007 11:04 am

This was not at all overpriced. It was well worth the $35 I paid for it on release.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43610

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2001 Château Smith Haut Lafitte

by Jenise » Sun May 20, 2007 12:55 pm

Brian K Miller wrote: There is just something about Bordeaux, overpriced as it may be.


Overpriced? When there's almost no cab left in California under $50? FWIW, I've been paying about the same or less for the 2001's than I paid for the 85's and 86's in my cellar all those years ago.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

34949

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: 2001 Château Smith Haut Lafitte

by David M. Bueker » Sun May 20, 2007 6:11 pm

If we take inflation into account, 2001 and 2002 (and many 2004) Bordeaux are just plain cheap. Sure they have gone up more than the rate of inflation, but unless we're talking about the "top" wines (e..g. first growth, first growth equivalents and super seconds) the wines have stayed pretty reasonable in any but the trophy years.

Of course all this maybe changing in 2006, but we don't know yet.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Brian K Miller

Rank

Passionate Arboisphile

Posts

9340

Joined

Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:05 am

Location

Northern California

Re: WTN: 2001 Château Smith Haut Lafitte

by Brian K Miller » Mon May 21, 2007 2:48 am

Oops. Bad choice of words on my part (I'm still remembering the other thread about $58 Bordeaux being outrageously overpriced) :oops: It is not a $10.99 everyday wine was what I was thinking. :oops:

Nope. I feel SHL is very fairly priced. I certainly enjoyted it more than the brambly, sweet Mount Veeder Reserve cab I tried today at twice the price! (They have a great Zinfandel, though. I LIKE Mount Veeder district Zinfandels-and it was $25!)
...(Humans) are unique in our capacity to construct realities at utter odds with reality. Dogs dream and dolphins imagine, but only humans are deluded. –Jacob Bacharach

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, SemrushBot and 3 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign