If “sulphidisation” has the same meaning as the term “sulfurization”, to treat or subject to the action of sulfur, then I would have to definitely agree with Hoke’s and Howie’s assessment that “sulphidisation is the result of sloppy winemaking”.
But I truly think that a statement like “sulfur related problems are the result of sloppy winemaking” is very misleading. One should not think that “all” sulfur related problems are the result of “sloppy winemaking”.
There is literally hundreds of known sulfur containing compounds found in wines. Some of these compounds may contribute a positive characteristic others a negative characteristic. But if one thinks about it, any one of these sulfur containing compounds could be a source of sulfur and possible result in a negative characteristic or fault. In reality, I guess there is no way to produce a wine that is totally sulfur compound free, the only thing one can possible hope for is that the concentration of these compounds be kept at “acceptable levels” or at levels that can be held in “check” until the consumer can drink it. But then again, maybe in the future instead of using a living organism to conduct alcoholic fermentation, maybe winemakers will only use the “appropriate” enzymes to produce the so-called “ideal” wine.
Salute