The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: In Memoriam

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

34935

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

WTN: In Memoriam

by David M. Bueker » Mon Apr 24, 2023 9:01 pm

1997 Joseph Phelps Insignia - USA, California, Napa Valley (4/24/2023)
Today would have been my father’s 80th birthday. Pulled this bottle from his cellar for a quiet memorial dinner. There has been a conventional belief that 1997 was the vintage where Napa went to the dark side. After sampling numerous 1997s over the last few months I have to disagree with that. 1997 was an excellent vintage that set in motion changes that were made in attempts to emulate it, and that’s where things went wrong. 1998-2000 were not years for big and balanced. Attempts to achieve that led to the blueberry milkshake excesses of the early to mid 2000s. This wine had excellent balance, with still prominent black fruit, as well as silky palate presence and emerging tobacco and earthy notes. There was sufficient structure for balance, but it was easily ignored, like a good referee - necessary but unobtrusive. My mom and I both loved the wine, though it would have been better shared by three.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8088

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

Re: WTN: In Memoriam

by TomHill » Mon Apr 24, 2023 10:12 pm

I expect your Dad was looking down from above, David, and silently gloating over how good it was.
Tom
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9420

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: In Memoriam

by Rahsaan » Tue Apr 25, 2023 7:41 am

Nice note.

Didn't this wine get 100 Parker points, back when that didn't happen all too much. Of course I have no idea how many wines ended up getting 100 points from him over the years, although I'm sure someone somewhere has catalogued and drunk all of them, perhaps in one sitting!

But I do have vague memories of this being a big deal that it got such a perfect score.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

34935

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: In Memoriam

by David M. Bueker » Tue Apr 25, 2023 8:08 am

It was actually a little odd. The wine hovered around 96 in TWA from release until a later Insignia retrospective in 2013 where Parker gave it the 100, and bestowed the same magic catnip on the 2002 Insignia.

If I were someone who gave scores for wines consumed as wines (as opposed to tasting settings) I would probably give this particular bottle 18.5/20. Roughly a 93 or so range if I tried the 100 point scale. Really good wine. Not “Gandalf’s fireworks.”
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9420

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: In Memoriam

by Rahsaan » Tue Apr 25, 2023 8:29 am

David M. Bueker wrote:It was actually a little odd. The wine hovered around 96 in TWA from release until a later Insignia retrospective in 2013 where Parker gave it the 100, and bestowed the same magic catnip on the 2002 Insignia.


Well, so much for my memory!

But, I guess it was always a Prestige Wine.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, DotBot, SemrushBot and 8 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign