The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Rasmussen PinotNoir Carneros '88....(short/boring)

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8088

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

WTN: Rasmussen PinotNoir Carneros '88....(short/boring)

by TomHill » Sun Aug 14, 2022 7:36 pm

Tried the Pinot w/ Casey Fri night, w/ very low expectations:
1. KentRasmussenWnry PinotNoir Carneros (13%; kentrasmussenwinery.com/) Napa 1988: Dark color w/ some murky browning; strong smokey/rather Burgundian/mature PN/pencilly quite complex not at all tired nose; lightly tart pencilly/cedary/rather Burgundian fully mature PN some toasty/smokey/Fr.oak graceful/elegant slight metallic/aged gentle/smooth rather complex/Burgundian flavor w/ light gentle bit drying tannins; very long/lingering smoth/elegant/graceful quite Burgundian smokey/Fr.oak slight cherry/PN complex finish w/ light gentle tannins; not at all tired or dried out but a quite lovely fully mature quite Burgundian PN that is just quietly fading into the sunset. $20.30 (K)
___________________________
More Rasswirdle from TheBloodyPulpit:
1. I had expected this Pinot to be totally dead. It was not. Just a little old lady in her dottage that is in the twlight of her yrs & quietly fading into the sunset. Both Casey & I were amazed that it still offered up some pleasure.
Kent started his wnry in 1986, making Chard & Pinot from his Estate vnyd deep into the Carneros in a tiny garage wnry on the property. When I did a visit w/ Kent, I took an instant liking to him. A sort of smallish man, he was wearing these bib overalls. He looked exactly like a little leprachaun that you could picture out in vnyd, leaning up against a vine, pipe in his mouth, smoking some of that funny stuff that winemakers smoke. We have had occasional interactions over the yrs. He now lives full time down in Berkeley.
I have, of course, followed Kent from the very start. Fell in love w/ his early wines and did a visit w/ him at his family vnyd deep into the Carneros, when his tiny wnry was located there. He specialized in Pinot & Chard grown on the Estate.
The early Rasmussen wines tended to be made in a reductive fashion and I started to coin the term the "Rasmussen stench". But they always aged out of it and became beautiful wines.
Kent reminds me a lot of AdamTolmach. Neither are what you would call marketing geniuses. In fact, "anti-marketers" would be more accurate. Which is why his wines are not easy to find. He has no marketing program and I buy them only when I happen to stumble upon them on a retail shelf.
He also makes wine, from purchased grapes, under the Ramsay label, named after his wife, Celia Ramsay, a very highly regarded folk muscician in the EastBay area. And a tiny amount of wine under his Esoterica label, which I gather is no longer being made.
Great wines, great people...they should be better known.
Tom
no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8088

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

Kent Sez....

by TomHill » Thu Aug 18, 2022 4:01 pm

Over the last few months whilst his son was living with them, Kent worked his way thru all of the Pinots that he's made. Here's what he found:
Kent wrote:86, 87 - Both still fabulous. I think that the 1987 was the best PN I ever made....which is funny because it went through a horrible funky period right when we released it and I took it off the market.
88 - +/- - nice, but very old
89 - Very very good. Another interesting issue. I have always thought of 1989 as the only BAD vintage in Napa during my 45 years as a winemaker (there have been a few mediocre ones however). The issue with 89 was that we had a horrible storm in mid September (5 inches of rain in 5 hours!!!!). Until then it had been a picture-perfect harvest. Pretty much everything swelled-up (most everyone dry farmed in those days), blew up and then rotted. HOWEVER the few grapes that had already been picked (including this PN) were fantastic.
90 - no stock
91, 92, 93 all dead and gone
94 - still nice, but teetering
95 very very good on two bottles and pretty so-so on a third
96 and 97 (We made a "regular" and a "reserve" both years) - all were still good, but not great
98 - wonderful and holding
99 - ok
2000 - crap (I always say that vintage 2000 had the shortest possible run as "vintage of the century")
01 - nice but teetering
2002 - nice
2003, 2004, 2005, all nice and holding
2006 and 2007 - Both very good, but showing signs of not holding much longer.
2008 - no stock
2009 and 2010 - both still lovely and holding well.

What is interesting in this is that, other than the run in the early 90s, all these wines were still good drinking plus-or-minus. It says a lot about Carneros PN!!! Sadly, Carneros has tarnished as a PN appellation in recent years. It is too bad, as I think it has a lot more legs than some of the current favorite appellations, especially in Sonoma....but as we all know....in the wine industry marketing is often more indicative of quality than reality.


I was amused by his comment on marketing. From a guy who was sort of an anti-marketing guy.
Tom
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43588

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: Rasmussen PinotNoir Carneros '88....(short/boring)

by Jenise » Sat Aug 20, 2022 1:06 pm

Interesting. Know the winery name, but it's not a brand I ever see at retail. Now I know why.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

34936

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: WTN: Rasmussen PinotNoir Carneros '88....(short/boring)

by David M. Bueker » Sat Aug 20, 2022 1:14 pm

Did they do a late harvest Sauvignon Blanc at one time? I seem to recall it.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8088

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

Yup..

by TomHill » Sun Aug 21, 2022 12:34 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:Did they do a late harvest Sauvignon Blanc at one time? I seem to recall it.


Yup, David. I think he made several. And PetiteSirah Port.
Tom

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google AgentMatch and 28 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign