The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Haut-Bailly & Montrose 2003

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Saina

Rank

Musaroholic

Posts

3976

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:07 pm

Location

Helsinki, Finland

WTN: Haut-Bailly & Montrose 2003

by Saina » Thu Feb 22, 2007 5:43 pm

Haut-Bailly 2003

This property seems to hit all the right spots for me. It makes a refined, yet earthy and typical Pessac without lashings of new oak nor huge extraction. It is elegant and savoury and begs me to take another sip - all things I like to see in a wine.

I had brief sip of this before at a formal tasting (blind, BTW) where I thought it very nice. Though it was only a 5cl taste, on the basis of this showing I decided to buy a bottle. Today we had a small gathering of friends, and since one participant in a magnanimous gesture brought a Montrose 2003 over, I decided to open my bottle to see if I should buy more.

Upon opening, I was a little frightended as it showed much of a dill-like oakiness to it - and this is something I just cannot stand in wine. 10 mins later, it had disippated and I was glad. It did show a rather roasted/warm year character to the fruit, and the fruit was darker toned than normal for the property. The nose is savoury and beautifully vegetal (but not underripe at all - if anything, the opposite!), but apart from the tiniest hint of cassis, there isn't really much to say that it is Bordeaux. It does have a nice depth to it, and I am quite certain it will develop well, but I am not too convinced anymore it is a wine to my tastes.

The palate is abundantly fruity, with noticable but ripe tannins, too low acidity for my tastes. The oak is noticable now, but isn't a vanillary type of "modern" feel to it, but rather it is what I would expect to find in a young Bordeaux and which I feel should integrate well. The aftertaste is long and savoury and surprisingly shows some nice acidity.

I honestly don't know if I'll bother to buy another bottle of this. It has elements I really love, yet the level of ripeness is a bit too much for me. If I see this in the shop at the same price, I probably will buy one bottle, but I won't go out of my way to get more.

Montrose 2003

I feel a bit ungenerous opening "only" a bottle of one of my favourite Bordeaux properties when my guests brings a Montrose. But I'll make it up the next time.

The all too few Montroses I've tried have been very much to my taste. In fact it is a property, like Haut-Bailly, that I hold very dear to my heart despite having much fewer experiences with it. But this 2003 is a wine that I don't comprehend. The nose is sickeningly sweet: it smells of banana-bread! The fruit is very dark toned and though it has a few savoury scents to it that brings a bit of lift to the wine, I don't find it pleasurable.

The palate is also massive: the fruit is overwhelming; the tannins are copious albeit soft. One might be right in saying that this shows potential now rather than being a pleasurable drink in its own right. But frankly I don't see this developing into something I would like in the future either! It is no secret that I prefer my wines lean and elegant and green and savoury: rather understated than overstated. This wine, in my opinion, was overstated. Impressive, but not at all to my style.

Thankfully my friend is a very open minded imbiber (much more than me, I'm afraid) and had no problems with me both serving a humbler wine (I'll make it up the next time) and not liking what he brought! :-)

-Otto-
I don't drink wine because of religious reasons ... only for other reasons.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21717

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: WTN: Haut-Bailly & Montrose 2003

by Robin Garr » Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:05 pm

Otto Nieminen wrote:2003


But Otto, don't you think this says it all? A vintage so bizarre that even its <i>good</i> wines are atypical? I'll drink some of them, but I won't look for typicity. And it still just shivers me timbers to see the ratings that the Usual Suspects gave.
no avatar
User

Saina

Rank

Musaroholic

Posts

3976

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:07 pm

Location

Helsinki, Finland

Re: WTN: Haut-Bailly & Montrose 2003

by Saina » Thu Feb 22, 2007 6:18 pm

I unfortunately look for typicity in all wines I drink. Which is why I only have a couple bottles of European 2003s in my wine fridge. A strange vintage for sure...
I don't drink wine because of religious reasons ... only for other reasons.
no avatar
User

Bill Hooper

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2001

Joined

Sat Mar 25, 2006 12:46 am

Location

McMinnville, OR

Re: WTN: Haut-Bailly & Montrose 2003

by Bill Hooper » Fri Feb 23, 2007 2:53 am

I have an '01 Montrose downstairs. Had any recently?


Prost!
Bill
no avatar
User

Saina

Rank

Musaroholic

Posts

3976

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:07 pm

Location

Helsinki, Finland

Re: WTN: Haut-Bailly & Montrose 2003

by Saina » Fri Feb 23, 2007 2:26 pm

Bill Hooper wrote:I have an '01 Montrose downstairs. Had any recently?


Prost!
Bill


Bill, sorry - I don't think I have ever tasted it.

I'm finishing the leftovers just now: The Montrose hasn't budged at all overnight.

The Haut-Bailly is showing a bit more Pessac character on the nose than last night, but the fruit on the palate is shutting down and the tannins are quite to the fore. Anyhow, with the added typicity and less fruit forward profile I do prefer this today than yesterday.
I don't drink wine because of religious reasons ... only for other reasons.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ClaudeBot, DotBot and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign