Paul B. wrote:Hoke, I disagree completely with the spirit of your post and I agree with what he has written. Perhaps it is you who need to widen your views a bit? Vidal makes delightful table wines in all the styles - from bone dry to semi-dry to late-harvest, all the way to icewine.
You are of course free to your preferences ... but please respect others' as well.
Paul, I do respect other's preferences, I was simply registering my own preferences. How is that not respectful?
As to widening my views a bit: I think I can claim, without any fear of being challenged by you, to have far wider ranging views, and to have tasted a far wider range of wines, than you have ever imagined.
You don't need to describe the varied styles of Vidal Blanc to me. I've tasted them all, many, many times, and over many, many years, and from many---well, not many, I guess, but several---different places and producers. I have thoroughly investigated Vidal Blanc, along with pretty much every other hybrid, cross, mutation, native/non vinifera, wild grape variety or blend thereof that I could get my hands on. I have unflaggingly, and often to my palate's displeasure, dutifully tasted some of the worst (and occasionally wonderful) wines ever made, all in the search of being as knowledgeable and informed as I could possibly be in my chosen profession.
You choose to proselytize a certain very narrow segment of wines, then criticize other people when they do not share your dazzlement with them. That you are excited about that narrow subset is fine; I actually admire that. But that you choose to proselytize at every opportunity (and often without actually knowing anything about the wines you champion), and then take umbrage when someone does not share the evangelical fervor you think appropriate and cares enough to say so----that is unacceptable, Paul.
If I spoke out of ignorance, you might be right to upbraid me. If I spoke out of malice, you could chide me as well. I was speaking neither in ignorance nor from malice, however. I was pointing out that your booster quote perhaps didn't parse as well to the uninitiated as you might think: it's overly simplistic, puts forth a false either/or argument, uses poor logic...and it seems silly to me to have a Pennsylvania viticulurist championing a Rhode Island wine against a totally separate category of other wines. What, there are no good PA wines? Rhode Island is the very core of Vidal? Vidal and (I assume poorly made Chardonnay from regions where it does not do well) are in some way similar to each other?
Just so you'll be clear, Paul, I wasn't really dissing Vidal. (I don't care for it overly much, but neither do I dislike it when well made.) I was more criticizing your "tag line". It sucks. But then, I don't generally like tag lines anyway. They smack too much of bumper stickers. Bumper stickers I have to look at briefly, then they're gone. Tag lines on a forum don't go away nearly as quickly; they stay around and tend to get analyzed for content and internal logic.