Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Joel wrote:Ha! I love it when one of my wines exceeds expectations. This wine was a pleasant accident. It was a vineyard high up on the West side of Dry Creek Valley farmed by John Teldeschi. I was using it for the Sonoma County Zinfandel blend. The location produced wines that were very high in acid and low in Ph. I kept waiting for the pH to drop, but it was very recalcitrant. By the time I finally picked it the brix was quite high, but there were hardly any dehydrated berries, which is quite unusual for Zin. I fermented it straight, and It ended up stuck, but tasted so good that I decided to bottle some as a late harvest.
Joel on the go!
Memento Vivere.
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
34947
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker wrote:TA is usually expressed in g/l. Did the label really say per 100 ml?
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
34947
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
TomHill wrote:David M. Bueker wrote:TA is usually expressed in g/l. Did the label really say per 100 ml?
Nope, David...the label said 13.0 gm/l.
I have a mathematical background, so was able to convert it from gm/l to gm/100ml on my computer so you can read it as 1.3%!!
Tom
David M. Bueker wrote:TomHill wrote:David M. Bueker wrote:TA is usually expressed in g/l. Did the label really say per 100 ml?
Nope, David...the label said 13.0 gm/l.
I have a mathematical background, so was able to convert it from gm/l to gm/100ml on my computer so you can read it as 1.3%!!
Tom
So why present it differently? Just trying to show off? I am a physicist, so you are not getting it past me.
Users browsing this forum: ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, DotBot, Ripe Bot and 5 guests