by Paul B. » Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:01 pm
Thanks James. I think that here in Ontario, where we have a relatively small but thriving wine region, Pinot Noir and Cab Franc are the two red viniferas that I think have done well of the ones that have been most focused on. Cab Sauvignon, to my taste, is annoyingly green almost every vintage, unless it's a whopper vintage like 1998 or maybe 2005. Some other red viniferas such as the Central European Zweigelt and Blaufränkisch would do well in our area also, but they carry far less name cachet than the popular French grapes and so their acreage (and the publicity behind them) is limited.
Having said that, hybrids are one of my favourite categories of all because I believe that when a vine is climatically suited to one's terroir, it will establish itself better and grow more reliably given the climate. Here in Ontario we are lucky that a few visionaries saw beyond the old way of thinking about hybrids and began in the mid-to-late '90s to craft huge, inky reds, barrel ageing them and turning out wines of great power, colour and flavour interest, if not finesse. But as I like to say, there's more to life than finesse - and if we can make wines of forceful personality from hybrids that bespeak the wild pedigrees of the vines, then more power to such wineries.
As far as the Chaddsford Chambourcin goes, it's better than any Chambourcin I've tasted from Ontario, and we don't have many here - mostly we have Foch and Baco Noir (Foch is my favourite of the two). I feel that our growing season is a tad too short to do Chambourcin really well. Once you get into Pennsylvania and Indiana, that's where Chambourcin seems to really shine.
http://hybridwines.blogspot.ca