by David M. Bueker » Wed Jan 31, 2018 11:18 am
I was reading a few notes people had posted on some wines, specifically California Pinot Noir, and I was struck by some very similar comments in the notes.
"It was good, perhaps very good, but I was looking for something extra."
"With all the positive comments, I expected a transformative experience."
"It costs as much as a really good village Burg, so why isn't it better?"
Now let's be fair, that the release pricing on the three wines was $59, $49 and $45, so none of them were value picks, but I could not help but wonder if the drinkers were spoiled by expectations. They opened the bottles expecting to be blown away, and were not. All noted positive reactions to the wines, but not gushing praise.
I know I have been there many times. I open a wine, and am looking for a bit of magic. The wine delivers a solid performance, and I feel let down. It's happened with California Pinot, German Riesling, Bordeaux, and pretty much everything else. When I used to attend big offlines, the story was that the white wines always overperformed, while the reds underperformed. That was largely because we had lower expectations for the white wines (well...maybe not me), and the reds suffered under the weight of their labels. We could not let the wine just be the wine.
Does this feel familiar? Have you opened a bottle, expecting to be transported to another dimension, yet been left at the dinner table? Was it you, or was it the wine.
Decisions are made by those who show up