The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

NYTimes: Asimov on Montepulciano d'Abruzzo

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8258

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

NYTimes: Asimov on Montepulciano d'Abruzzo

by TomHill » Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:42 am

Interesting article in today's NYTimes by Eric:
Montepulciano d'Abruzzo

I didn't realize there were any priced above $100/btl. Slathered w/ new Fr.oak I gather. Sigh!!

The NYTimes headline doesn't reflect the subject matter very well.
Tom
no avatar
User

Patchen Markell

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1127

Joined

Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:18 am

Location

Ithaca, New York

Re: NYTimes: Asimov on Montepulciano d'Abruzzo

by Patchen Markell » Fri Jul 14, 2017 12:08 pm

Actually, I think Emidio Pepe -- one of the $100/bottle labels Asimov refers to -- is known for having resisted the push toward new oak, and has used cement vats for his reds since the 1960s. Anti-slathering can make for cult status as much as slathering, I guess!
cheers, Patchen
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4968

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: NYTimes: Asimov on Montepulciano d'Abruzzo

by Tim York » Sun Jul 16, 2017 1:47 am

Good article as often from Azimov. This confirms my impression that, while the Montepulciano grape along Italy's mid-Adriatic coast provides some of the best value entry level reds, it is in less apt to provide ambitious wine with oak ageing. I have rarely enjoyed a Montepulciano d'Abruzzo or Rosso Conero costing more than €20 and often prefer the entry level cuvée to the second let alone the top cuvée. A case in point is Masciarelli where the second cuvée Marina Cvetic sometimes seems to me a little overblown.

Lovely exceptions to my €20 ceiling have been Moroder's Rosso Conero Dorico Riserva 2001 at age 9 (c.€25 for a young vintage) and a Emidio Pepe's Riserva 2003 at a Paris tasting last year.
Tim York
no avatar
User

ChaimShraga

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

663

Joined

Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:53 am

Location

Tel-Aviv, Israel

Re: NYTimes: Asimov on Montepulciano d'Abruzzo

by ChaimShraga » Sun Jul 16, 2017 5:52 am

2 out of 3 of the Pepe reds I've tried were so laden with brett that they were a sanitary hazard.
Positive Discrimination For White Wines!
http://2GrandCru.blogspot.com
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4968

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: NYTimes: Asimov on Montepulciano d'Abruzzo

by Tim York » Sun Jul 16, 2017 8:40 am

ChaimShraga wrote:2 out of 3 of the Pepe reds I've tried were so laden with brett that they were a sanitary hazard.


At the same Paris tasting I noted brett on their 2011 M d'A but not at an offensively obtrusive level (NB I am quite brett tolerant). I think that brett is often a problem with risk taking vignerons but their results can be superb when the brett bullet is avoided.
Tim York
no avatar
User

ChaimShraga

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

663

Joined

Fri Oct 03, 2008 4:53 am

Location

Tel-Aviv, Israel

Re: NYTimes: Asimov on Montepulciano d'Abruzzo

by ChaimShraga » Mon Jul 17, 2017 2:12 am

One bottle was so bad, it felt as though the brett was causing the wine to re-ferment. I'm exaggerating, of course, and it's a very unscientific observation. But really, it felt like the brett was still alive in the glass, like something out of a 50's horror movie.

The white wine I tried was actually quite fresh for something I can only surmise was supposed to be an orange wine.

I'm not going there again. I think Pepe is the exact opposite of risk taking. I think he/they romanticize the "old ways" at the cost of quality control. The hipsters can keep him.
Positive Discrimination For White Wines!
http://2GrandCru.blogspot.com

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Apple Bot, Baidu [Spider], ClaudeBot, PetalBot and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign