Bill Hooper wrote:I haven't seen that one, but the seal on a screw-cap closure is made where the flat insert (top) part of the cap meets the glass bottle so there shouldn't be a difference. The thread looks the same.
Victorwine wrote:I agree with Bill. The “skirt” part of the screw cap has nothing to do with the function of the cap itself, only to resemble the “traditional foils and capsules”. When you break the seal of a screw cap the liner and screw cap part separates because there are perforations where the cap attaches to the skirt part. So in reality the screw cap only has to be that long.
Victorwine wrote:I agree with Bill. The “skirt” part of the screw cap has nothing to do with the function of the cap itself, only to resemble the “traditional foils and capsules”. When you break the seal of a screw cap the liner and screw cap part separates because there are perforations where the cap attaches to the skirt part. So in reality the screw cap only has to be that long.
Paul Winalski
Wok Wielder
9002
Wed Mar 22, 2006 9:16 pm
Merrimack, New Hampshire
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36000
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36000
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
David M. Bueker wrote:It probably is cheaper, but it also uses less resources. If the seal is the same I don't see an issue. The question is what is under the cap.
Do you object to lighter weight bottles because they are cheaper?
Victorwine wrote:Stelvin will start making a short, sleeveless cap now, and how they will market it against their regular closures
Amcor does, they call it “Aluflash” and they are designed for screw cap bottles not designed for long skirts.
https://www.amcor.com/CMSPages/GetFile. ... c28c841154
Users browsing this forum: Babbar, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch and 0 guests