The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43596

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Jenise » Sat Jan 06, 2007 1:21 pm

Ordered last night for $17.50 from a pizza joint wine list. What a delight: both the wine, which was medium bodied and bursting with berry and sweet herbs in a way that was honest and unabashed and tasted like barbera without giving up it's Amador-ness, and the fact that this great little pizza place sells bottles of wine for about 1.5 times retail. Pure unadulturated joy in a bottle. Wish every bottle I ordered in a restaurant was as delicious and rewarding as this.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Mike Filigenzi

Rank

Known for his fashionable hair

Posts

8187

Joined

Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:43 pm

Location

Sacramento, CA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Mike Filigenzi » Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:29 pm

These guys seem to maybe be on the way back up. We went to a wedding at the winery a couple of months ago and were pleasantly surprised by the wines served at the reception. Glad to hear the barbera was good as well.


Mike
"People who love to eat are always the best people"

- Julia Child
no avatar
User

Bob Henrick

Rank

Kamado Kommander

Posts

3919

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm

Location

Lexington, Ky.

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Bob Henrick » Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:47 pm

Darn you Jenise, now I have to go out and get a bottle or three of this for $7 each. Thanks!
Bob Henrick
no avatar
User

Rod Miller

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

131

Joined

Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:52 pm

Location

El Dorado, CA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Rod Miller » Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:19 pm

Barbera's are turning our to be the allstar of the appellation. One might argue that sangiovese and syrahs are second and zins a third.
May all beings find happiness and the causes of happiness!!!!
no avatar
User

Carl Eppig

Rank

Our Maine man

Posts

4149

Joined

Tue Jun 13, 2006 1:38 pm

Location

Middleton, NH, USA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Carl Eppig » Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:45 pm

Don't forget those from Mendocino too.
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43596

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Jenise » Sun Jan 07, 2007 1:31 pm

Rod, that's interesting. I haven't had many American barberas, in fact when I ordered this my brain remembered the last Renwood I had and said, "Are you sure you want to do this?" I'm not a fan of the Renwood style, and that's about the only Amador Barbera I recall having. Who else is doing it, and whose efforts stand out in your opinion?
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Mark Willstatter

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

447

Joined

Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:20 pm

Location

Puget Sound

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Mark Willstatter » Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:38 pm

Jenise wrote:Rod, that's interesting. I haven't had many American barberas, in fact when I ordered this my brain remembered the last Renwood I had and said, "Are you sure you want to do this?" I'm not a fan of the Renwood style, and that's about the only Amador Barbera I recall having. Who else is doing it, and whose efforts stand out in your opinion?


Jenise, you might want to check out this recent thread where we were discussing this very topic: http://www.wineloverspage.com/forum/village/viewtopic.php?t=5412
no avatar
User

Rod Miller

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

131

Joined

Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:52 pm

Location

El Dorado, CA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Rod Miller » Sun Jan 07, 2007 2:54 pm

Thanks Mark. Renwood has suffered from winemaker of the month syndrome...I think you can taste tartaric acid they add (trying to get acid where there isn't much)...but this is topic drift.
May all beings find happiness and the causes of happiness!!!!
no avatar
User

Mark Willstatter

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

447

Joined

Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:20 pm

Location

Puget Sound

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Mark Willstatter » Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:07 pm

There couple of other things I might have added before. Like you, I've never been a huge fan of the Renwood style but when I tasted there, my favorite wine in the lineup was often their Linsteadt Vineyard Barbera (they used to make two, Amador County and Linsteadt). I don't believe they get Linsteadt fruit anymore. In fact, I see online that Vino Noceto is now making a Linsteadt Barbera. Noceto often does a decent job with Sangiovese, so although I've never tried their version, it might be worth looking for. Noceto's website shows their 2003 sold out, though. I think the 2003 may have been their first Barbera. FYI, Noceto is also making a Grandpére Zin, calling it "OGP", presumably to avoid legal problems with Renwood.

As I mentioned in the other thread, another Sierra Foothills Barbera I've liked over the years is from Boeger, although I haven't tried recent vintages. It's not quite as inexpensive as the Montevina but still reasonable at around $15 retail. As I also mentioned there, the Cooper vineyard has for years been the source of Easton/Terre Rouge's Barberas and, like some other growers in the area, now selling wine as well as fruit. And just FYI, as I understand it, Montevina has made a fairly sizeable commitment to Barbera, having planted 100+ acres (I think).

So those are some possibilities if you're interested in further exploring Sierra Foothills Barberas.
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10808

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Sun Jan 07, 2007 9:28 pm

All this California Barbera talk has me thinking an Open Mike!!! Up here, not too many around and no hope of the Seghesio either cos I called the agent!!

Anyone want to set it up for later this week?? All we have to do is mention it and away we go!!
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43596

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Jenise » Mon Jan 08, 2007 12:41 pm

Mark, thanks for bringing that other thread (which obviously, I missed in its entirety) to my attention. Funny I have the same memory of Renwood, of tasting there and liking the barbera best because even though all their wines tasted alike the barbera came closest to having something distinctive about it. I'll be on the lookout for some of the other names you mentioned.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Mark Willstatter

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

447

Joined

Mon Jun 26, 2006 1:20 pm

Location

Puget Sound

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Mark Willstatter » Mon Jan 08, 2007 2:34 pm

Jenise, I don't know if it means anything but Thor was also a fan of the Lindsteadt Barberas and he's also generally not one to gravitate to Renwood, for more reasons than just their style of wine. In fact, a couple of years ago, when the Linsteadt fruit left Renwood, he asked me if I could find out where the it was going. At the time, I was unsuccessful. Also, just FYI, looking around the Renwood site, I notice that despite all the information about past vintages at Renwood, they have expunged the site of all reference to Linsteadt. All, that is, except a note decribing their 1999 Amador Barbera, where it's mentioned that their estate vineyard Barbera was cloned from the Lindsteadt vines. I suppose that tells us the high regard in which that fruit was held, that they cloned Linsteadt Barbera in the same way they cloned "Grandpére" vines on their side of Steiner Road. I imagine the only reason they didn't trademark "Lindsteadt" like they did Grandpére is that the former is somebody's name!

Finally, just a note on spelling of the original thread topic: it's Montevina, with an a at the end.
no avatar
User

Rod Miller

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

131

Joined

Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:52 pm

Location

El Dorado, CA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Rod Miller » Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:26 pm

Several other Sierra Region Barbera's include Jeff Runquist "R" Barbera, Obscurity Cellars, and Deaver.

Excuse my ignorance but is what I did the purpose of an open mike?
May all beings find happiness and the causes of happiness!!!!
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10808

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:35 pm

Rod Miller wrote:Several other Sierra Region Barbera's include Jeff Runquist "R" Barbera, Obscurity Cellars, and Deaver.

Excuse my ignorance but is what I did the purpose of an open mike?


Hi Rod, Open Mike is when someone picks a wine, say for instance, Renwood Barbera. If there is interest you post your impressions and see who else chips in. Its that simple...this past weekend a few of us tasted Montepulciano here on this forum. Link easy to find!!
no avatar
User

Rod Miller

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

131

Joined

Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:52 pm

Location

El Dorado, CA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Rod Miller » Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:45 pm

Sounds like fun. Go for it.
May all beings find happiness and the causes of happiness!!!!
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10808

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Mon Jan 08, 2007 8:50 pm

Rod, is there a specific California Barbera you have in mind/can get access to? Bear in mind it should be a wine readily accessible to those forumites interested in taking part.
no avatar
User

Rod Miller

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

131

Joined

Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:52 pm

Location

El Dorado, CA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Rod Miller » Mon Jan 08, 2007 9:08 pm

Would probably have to be this one, ie. 04 Montevina Barbera or 03. J Runquist, Obscuritycellars, Deaver, Dillian, Boeger, Cooper, and 03 Karmere. Are all better but likely not available.

Renwood might be available, but hate to give them the pub. It would be fun to have some calibration.

To generalize do you think it is fair to say a Barbera tastes like petite Syrah without the intense tannin or acid?
May all beings find happiness and the causes of happiness!!!!
no avatar
User

Rod Miller

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

131

Joined

Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:52 pm

Location

El Dorado, CA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Rod Miller » Mon Jan 08, 2007 10:36 pm

I was able to get the 03 Montevina Barbera in the grocery store for $7.99.
May all beings find happiness and the causes of happiness!!!!
no avatar
User

Rod Miller

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

131

Joined

Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:52 pm

Location

El Dorado, CA

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Rod Miller » Mon Jan 08, 2007 11:30 pm

Excuse me for jumping the gun. The 03 has the varietial flavor (a berry fruitiness) and is pretty balanced for a $8 wine. It has soft acid with a tartaric type sour. The difference between this and other Barbera's is that many really are much more fruit forward. I love this type of fruit. They typically are not sweet and have stable structure of mixed acid taste. This wine as an inexpensive wine and has a composite cork. They have a closed effect on the wine (they seal tighter almost like a synthetic cork) IMHO.

The Gold Hill Barbera of El Dorado County had a buttery soft finish.
May all beings find happiness and the causes of happiness!!!!
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43596

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Jenise » Tue Jan 09, 2007 1:44 pm

Rod, is there a specific California Barbera you have in mind/can get access to? Bear in mind it should be a wine readily accessible to those forumites interested in taking part.


Bob, you see "El Dorado" under Rod's name? Well, he lives pretty much at ground zero (Amador County), so he'll have access to many of the wines mentioned. No worries there. But I have to disagree with you about the need for a wine to be readily accessible--I can understand why you would personally want it that way for greater participation, but I'm compelled to point out that same isn't a rule for Open Mike.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10808

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:00 pm

If I suggest we taste Chateau Zinh Zong on Open Mike, surely it has to be available/accessible in local areas
Jenise, why do you continually downplay my Open Mike thought/suggestions??? My enthusiasm knows no bounds.
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43596

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Jenise » Tue Jan 09, 2007 2:43 pm

Not downplaying your suggestions at all, Bob. I'm just trying to prevent you from rewriting the rules, a trap you step into when you use a word like "should". Open Mike can be a topic as big as California Barbera, or as specific as a single vintage of a single producer. By reminding you of that, I'm not remonstrating you so much as making sure all who read along, including persons new among us, understand the concept.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10808

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:09 pm

Ok understood, one wrong choice of the word "should". To my mind, if someone posts an idea of a pssible OM I want to take part. Not all here will however and I can see that. I try to suggest a wine/wines that are readily available, look at the response to Malbec and Valpollicella!! Featuring a wine no-one has heard of/cannot find does not make much sense to me, altho` the Brachetto OM was quite educational eh.
There are some Washington wines I would like to consider as an OM subject but availability is poor up here naturally. Its tough.
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

43596

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2004 Montevino Barbera, Amador County

by Jenise » Tue Jan 09, 2007 4:21 pm

Glad you understand.

Featuring a wine no-one has heard of/cannot find does not make much sense to me, altho` the Brachetto OM was quite educational eh.


Exactly right if your objective is to explore a category of recent released wine. But sometimes the purpose can be to look into the progress of a vintage (like, "How are the 98 Bordeauxs doing?") or into a specific bottling that you realize you and a few other forum members happen to be holding or a new release you and somebody else are specifically curious about.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, Mark Golodetz and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign