by Patchen Markell » Thu Mar 17, 2016 9:12 pm
An interesting comparison tonight. We opened two Nerello Mascalese-based reds from Etna: a 2013 Benanti Etna Rosso "Rossodiverzella," mostly Nerello Mascalese with some Nerello Cappuccio in the mix; 13.5% ABV; $19.00; and a 2011 Passopisciaro IGP Sicilia Rosso, "Contrada Sciaranuovo," 100% Nerello Mascalese, 14.0% ABV, $75.00. The Benanti is a medium-garnet wine that leans slightly more toward the meaty and funky end of the palate than the most delicate Etnas, but it's still immediately accessible: lively, savory, and without a particularly tannic finish. Balanced and tasty. The Passopisciaro is a little deeper in color in the glass, though not as much as I expected; and while it's considerably more tannic, especially at first taste, it's not actually significantly different in mouthfeel and doesn't seem hot or thick. The flavor is darker and more concentrated, showing plum more than cherry, and there's a hint of prune that suggests riper fruit at harvest. Tasted on their own, my first reaction is to prefer the Benanti, which is what I'd have expected based on my general prejudices. But with time, and with strong food (pasta with broccoli rabe and Calabrian peppers), the Passopisciaro really comes into its own: the extra stuffing pays off, and the wine shows some floral and spice notes on top of the broadening fruit; it begins to remind me of a young Barbaresco, and makes me think it might be magical with some time. Hard to know what to take away from the comparison: the difference between them hardly seems dramatic enough to warrant the 4:1 ratio of prices; but the side-by-side does make the Passopisciaro seem like a serious candidate for cellaring in a way that the Benanti isn't (though it's a serious bargain for everyday drinking). Maybe I'll have another ounce in each glass and keep thinking about it.
cheers, Patchen