The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Rumblings on Wine - Part x of y

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36004

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Rumblings on Wine - Part x of y

by David M. Bueker » Mon Jul 27, 2015 11:26 am

A few things rattling around in my brain lately. Figured I would get them out before they did any more damage.

I’ve been on a bad run of Champagne lately, with three corked bottles and three more unimpressive performances over the last month. The issues have been with older, newer, humble and more exalted wines. Harrumph! I think it’s time to take a break from the bubbly. Laura will not be happy. I will try to soothe her displeasure with Riesling.

The magic of internet backlash has begun to hit the In Pursuit of Balance folks. Apparently Rajat Parr cannot advocate for the styles of wine he prefers, as it is an affront to those who prefer more oomph in their Pinot Noir (nobody seems worried about the Chardonnay wines). When did wine become politics? For whatever it’s worth, I had a Pinot Noir with 14.8% alcohol and some liberal (see what I did there) oak treatment the other night, and liked it. It was not a substitute for Burgundy, but I was not looking for Burgundy. There are a myriad of stylistic choices when it comes to Pinot Noir. There is also a vast array of different sites where the grape is planted. That will result in an uncountable number of variations for the finished wines. Which one is correct?

It’s going to be very hot and humid here in Connecticut this week, so I have decided that it will be “Rosé Week.” The Discovery Channel and their “Shark Week” can kiss my a**.

Fall mailer season has begun to ramp up. Things will likely get crazy in about 2 weeks. All the wineries are looking for cash flow, so they all cram their releases into the same early window. A few have even does their fall releases already. Then there’s Littorai, who released some of their fall wines during their spring offering. Futures have also become more popular, though not as extreme as in Bordeaux where 2 year before release is the norm. A few wineries (e.g. Rhys, Loring) have offered futures. The reason I like the Rhys futures is that they offer alternate bottle sizes. It’s been a great way to get some half bottles and even 500 ml bottles of really good wines. If more wineries would go that route, I would happily purchase alternate size bottles.

I have jumped on the bandwagon of several new wineries in the last couple of years. For the most part the results have been quite good, and in some cases excellent. There have been a couple of duds to my taste, and I have quietly dropped off those lists. There have been wildly enthusiastic comments around the wine web regarding each and every one of them, but it just goes to prove the different perceptions we all have regarding quality and style. I have written more than my fair share of positive comments regarding Idlewild and Enfield Wine Co., and I really like everything they make. One of the things I find worth highlighting, especially for Idlewild, is the pricing. With bottles from the low $20s up to just over $40, Sam Bilbro has created something rare in California, a reasonably priced portfolio from an emerging winery. John Lockwood’s wines (Enfield) are also very reasonable, though he does not have the low end pricing like Sam does, and he also dabbles in Cabernet, so the top end is higher. It’s nice to be able to order single-vineyard wines in the low to mid-$30s when so much of that market has pushed into the upper $40s and on up into the $90s from other wineries. There’s no sacrifice in quality either, as Sam and John are both producing top-flight wines. They remind me a bit of that Edmunds character. I hope they stick around as long.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8314

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

Yup....

by TomHill » Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:18 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:A few things rattling around in my brain lately. Figured I would get them out before they did any more damage.

Hope all that rattling around hasn't kept you awake at night, David.
The magic of internet backlash has begun to hit the In Pursuit of Balance folks. Apparently Rajat Parr cannot advocate for the styles of wine he prefers, as it is an affront to those who prefer more oomph in their Pinot Noir (nobody seems worried about the Chardonnay wines). When did wine become politics? For whatever it’s worth, I had a Pinot Noir with 14.8% alcohol and some liberal (see what I did there) oak treatment the other night, and liked it. It was not a substitute for Burgundy, but I was not looking for Burgundy. There are a myriad of stylistic choices when it comes to Pinot Noir. There is also a vast array of different sites where the grape is planted. That will result in an uncountable number of variations for the finished wines. Which one is correct?


Not sure I've seen anything that I'd characterize as a backlash against the IPoB folks, David. Of course, all the old-fogey writers/bloggers, like Heimhoff and Olken and Parker, have taken up the cudgel against Parr and IPoB movement. Me??? I just sorta shrug my shoulders and think "BFD". As for which Pinot is "correct"...not sure I much care. If they taste good, that's the bottom line for me.


I have jumped on the bandwagon of several new wineries in the last couple of years. For the most part the results have been quite good, and in some cases excellent. There have been a couple of duds to my taste, and I have quietly dropped off those lists. There have been wildly enthusiastic comments around the wine web regarding each and every one of them, but it just goes to prove the different perceptions we all have regarding quality and style. I have written more than my fair share of positive comments regarding Idlewild and Enfield Wine Co., and I really like everything they make. One of the things I find worth highlighting, especially for Idlewild, is the pricing. With bottles from the low $20s up to just over $40, Sam Bilbro has created something rare in California, a reasonably priced portfolio from an emerging winery. John Lockwood’s wines (Enfield) are also very reasonable, though he does not have the low end pricing like Sam does, and he also dabbles in Cabernet, so the top end is higher. It’s nice to be able to order single-vineyard wines in the low to mid-$30s when so much of that market has pushed into the upper $40s and on up into the $90s from other wineries. There’s no sacrifice in quality either, as Sam and John are both producing top-flight wines. They remind me a bit of that Edmunds character. I hope they stick around as long.


Yup....couldn't agree more about Sam's wines. Aren't you glad you're one of the TomHill sheep and led by the nose to those wines?? :roll:
Tom
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21880

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Rumblings on Wine - Part x of y

by Robin Garr » Mon Jul 27, 2015 12:41 pm

Good rattlings, David. Personally, I like IPoB. Table wines over 14% alch, including Pinot, don't appeal to me personally, and ample oak makes it even less appealing. I suppose I'm part of the AFWE. :twisted: I don't truly begrudge other people's right to drink that stuff. You have tempted me to put Idlewild on my shopping list, though ...
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36004

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Rumblings on Wine - Part x of y

by David M. Bueker » Mon Jul 27, 2015 1:23 pm

Tom,

Regarding the backlash on IPOB, I am thinking of the thread on Berserkers, where people are personally offended because Rajat Parr doesn't like their favorite style of Pinot Noir, and the Spec column that takes a sideways slap at the IPOB crowd. You knew it was coming, you just did not know when.

And thank you very much for the Idlewild tip. I hope you get a chance to try the Enfield Wine Co offerings soon. I have followed them from the very start. :wink:
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Brian K Miller

Rank

Passionate Arboisphile

Posts

9340

Joined

Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:05 am

Location

Northern California

Re: Rumblings on Wine - Part x of y

by Brian K Miller » Tue Jul 28, 2015 2:07 pm

Robin Garr wrote:Good rattlings, David. Personally, I like IPoB. Table wines over 14% alch, including Pinot, don't appeal to me personally, and ample oak makes it even less appealing. I suppose I'm part of the AFWE. :twisted: I don't truly begrudge other people's right to drink that stuff. You have tempted me to put Idlewild on my shopping list, though ...



We have established a reeducation center in the basement of CAYMUS, which according to the local rag has just been OPPRESSED, OPPRESSED I TELL YOU by local land use regulations in Napa. So they are eager to "work off" some energy
...(Humans) are unique in our capacity to construct realities at utter odds with reality. Dogs dream and dolphins imagine, but only humans are deluded. –Jacob Bacharach

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazon, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent and 0 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign