by Hoke » Thu May 28, 2015 9:24 pm
I agree, Dale. It does seem like a...disparate collection of brands...and they are clearly specifying brands, not wines.
But the whole concept of choosing a brand to admire is already entirely different than choosing a wine. Whatever "admire" means here.
I went back and read the expo and, frankly, they were never that clear as to what their criteria were. They do list four or five points of consideration, but honestly, they were vague to the point of being meaningless. Or gobbledygool.
The system was, um, strange as well. Choose 202 judges, show them the previous lists of 'most admired' and ask them to choose their top three. The judges can also "write in" a candidate of their own choice and exlain why. When the votes are all tallied a "small jury" (doesn't say who, or how many, or what they discuss, but of course no mag/website would ever let financial or political decisions have any bearing on such decisions, of course) gets to finalize the ranking.
And the website/mag then, in time-honored tradition, notifies each of the brands they have won---and urges them to take special advantage of this opportunity to run a full-page ad at special rates right next to the article.!!!!
So it all comes down to print/web using marketing to support brands which supply revenue.
And you're right again: with no focus and no coherency---other than "it's wine"---there's no reason beyond revenue for this list to exist.l