
Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker
Oliver McCrum
Wine guru
1076
Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 am
Oakland, CA; Cigliè, Piedmont
Oliver McCrum wrote:Tom,
I have had some very good Nebbiolo from Sisquoc, made by Palmina. I gave the wine blind to a Piedmontese enologist, and he was flabbergasted; varietally typical and very attractive wine, sometimes the alcohol is a bit intrusive but that's becoming an issue in the Langhe too.
I don't think Michet, Lampia and Rosé are clones, more like types.
Oliver McCrum
Wine guru
1076
Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 am
Oakland, CA; Cigliè, Piedmont
Oliver McCrum wrote:All of that is confirmed by the amazing new Ian d'Agata book, Tom, except for the 'clone' part. They (Lampia, Michet) are biotypes, not clones. There probably are numerous refences to them as 'clones' on the internet, just as there are of 'the Brunello clone of Sangiovese.'
Oliver McCrum
Wine guru
1076
Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 am
Oakland, CA; Cigliè, Piedmont
TomHill wrote:Oliver McCrum wrote:All of that is confirmed by the amazing new Ian d'Agata book, Tom, except for the 'clone' part. They (Lampia, Michet) are biotypes, not clones. There probably are numerous refences to them as 'clones' on the internet, just as there are of 'the Brunello clone of Sangiovese.'
So...Oliver...help me out. What is the difference between biotype vs. clone?? With Google, it refers me to a scientific paper written in 1912.
DNA cannot distinguish between clones of a variety. Can it do so between bio-types.
I'll look again at d'Agata when I get home.
Tom
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, APNIC Bot, Bing [Bot], ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, DotBot, FB-extagent, LACNIC Exp, PetalBot and 1 guest