I've narrowed it down to:
1999 Ridge Lytton Springs
1999 Geyserville
Waddaya think?
I guess I could bring both, but I don't like these folks enough for that..

Redwinger
Wine guru
4038
Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:36 pm
Way Down South In Indiana, USA
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36382
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Dave R wrote:I have had both during the last quarter of this year and would advocate drinking the Geyserville at this time because it seemed from the bottles we recently had that the 1999 LS has a longer aging potential than the 1999 Geyserville.
Lou Kessler wrote:Dave R wrote:I have had both during the last quarter of this year and would advocate drinking the Geyserville at this time because it seemed from the bottles we recently had that the 1999 LS has a longer aging potential than the 1999 Geyserville.
The Geyserville usually ages better & longer than the LS but there may be exceptions.
I
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36382
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Dave R wrote:Lou Kessler wrote:Dave R wrote:I have had both during the last quarter of this year and would advocate drinking the Geyserville at this time because it seemed from the bottles we recently had that the 1999 LS has a longer aging potential than the 1999 Geyserville.
The Geyserville usually ages better & longer than the LS but there may be exceptions.
I
Have you had either recently, Lou Kessler? My tasting group and I have had both recently and we thought the 1999 LS has more aging potential but I would like to hear your recent impressions of the two bottles.
Redwinger
Wine guru
4038
Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:36 pm
Way Down South In Indiana, USA
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Apple Bot, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch, iphone swarm, LACNIC130, LACNIC160, TikTok, Yandexbot and 3 guests