Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
Otto Nieminen wrote:TN: Musar 1989 (2 hour decant + 3 hours drinking it) Most times I've tasted this, I've thought it very fine if not at the same level as the '88.
Musar '89 was perfect with it. It seems to have entered early maturity since my last bottle of it almost two years back. The nose is incredibly complex with a high toned spicy and cedary note that isn't all Bx like despite my use of "cedar". It is unique in its scents. The fruit is very sweet, not very funky in the sense that there isn't much shite to it, but it is very personal.
The palate has much fruit. The acidity is harsh and rasping as good Musar should be. The aftertaste is very fresh.
The wine is very lively and it dances on the tongue. It is not the greatest Musar ever made, but it is a dashed fine one.
-O-
Bob Henrick wrote: My last bottle was at Mo'Cool in August, and it was a murky color due I suppose, to suspended particles of sediment. Of course the wine had been transported from Kentucky to Michigan (about 300 miles) just couple days before opening, and the particles were very fine.
Bob Henrick
Kamado Kommander
3919
Thu Mar 23, 2006 7:35 pm
Lexington, Ky.
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Babbar, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, DotBot and 1 guest