Victorwine wrote:Right now there is a debate going on among the vine growers of California and those in the wine business- weight and hangtime. The productivity of vineyards in California is measured by ton per acre. Basically the longer the cluster of grapes hangs on the vines the Brix level increases (sugar concentration rises) and weight per berry decreases. Thus as the season progresses the vine growers actually takes a loss in ton per acre. The vine growers are suggesting that for every degree Brix above a given standard they should be able to charge a premium.
What’s your reaction to this?
Salute
Redwinger
Wine guru
4038
Wed Mar 22, 2006 2:36 pm
Way Down South In Indiana, USA
Florida Jim
Wine guru
1253
Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:27 pm
St. Pete., FL & Sonoma, CA
Victorwine wrote:Right now there is a debate going on among the vine growers of California and those in the wine business- weight and hangtime. The productivity of vineyards in California is measured by ton per acre. Basically the longer the cluster of grapes hangs on the vines the Brix level increases (sugar concentration rises) and weight per berry decreases. Thus as the season progresses the vine growers actually takes a loss in ton per acre. The vine growers are suggesting that for every degree Brix above a given standard they should be able to charge a premium.
What’s your reaction to this?
Salute
Victorwine wrote:Thanks for replying gentlemen. The first thing that flashed through my head (being an amateur winemaker who produces wines from California fruit) was that in 2007 I could expect to see an increase in grape prices.
Salute
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot and 0 guests