The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Pedro Ximenez Question

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Pedro Ximenez Question

by Tom Troiano » Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:25 pm

Trying to expand my horizons.....

Alvear 2011 Pedro Ximenez de Anada

Would this wine be bottled in 2011 from grapes grown in another year or from grapes grown in 2011 (or both, I suppose). The reason I ask is that I've seen the following:

produced with Pedro Ximenez grapes dehydrated under the sun at the time of the Second World War, was only bottled in September 2011. This is an extreme wine, my first descriptor was ultra-mega-super concentrated.

and somewhere else:

Alvear's 2011 Pedro Ximenez de Anada is the most amazing Pedro Ximenez I have ever tasted. It may also be one of the first to be vintage-dated. The grapes were hand-harvested in September, then allowed to dry in the sunshine until they began fermentation, which is ultimately arrested by the addition of spirits. The wine spent six months in large American oak prior to being bottled.
Tom T.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36382

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by David M. Bueker » Fri Feb 21, 2014 1:46 pm

I wish I knew, as I have 3 bottles!
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Tom Troiano » Fri Feb 21, 2014 2:20 pm

I will have 3 soon!

Its an interesting example of how the reviews/ratings on wine store web sites (even when they quote the WA or WS) aren't always correct. One of those write ups is clearly wrong as they both describe the same wine (on different web sites).
Tom T.
no avatar
User

Hoke

Rank

Achieving Wine Immortality

Posts

11420

Joined

Sat Apr 15, 2006 1:07 am

Location

Portland, OR

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Hoke » Fri Feb 21, 2014 2:34 pm

Tom Troiano wrote:I will have 3 soon!

Its an interesting example of how the reviews/ratings on wine store web sites (even when they quote the WA or WS) aren't always correct. One of those write ups is clearly wrong as they both describe the same wine (on different web sites).


Yep, primarily because a lot of the wine bloggers---and wine sellers---and a distressing number of wine critics

1. don't know WTF they're talking about a good part of the time.
2. yield to either badly re-phrasing marketing bs as a shortcut, hoping people will swallow it.
3. are just plain and simple bad writers who desperately need an editor.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36382

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by David M. Bueker » Fri Feb 21, 2014 2:35 pm

If one of those entries came from The Wine Advocate I would trust that, as the guy they hired who covers Sherry is very, very solid.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Charles Weiss

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

444

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:47 pm

Location

Boston

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Charles Weiss » Fri Feb 21, 2014 2:52 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:If one of those entries came from The Wine Advocate I would trust that, as the guy they hired who covers Sherry is very, very solid.



I thought the same thing, but looked and alas the second quote is from the Wine Advocate, but (Parker in full expansive mode) rather than Gutierrez. And as far as "the most amazing Pedro Ximenez I have ever tasted. It may also be one of the first to be vintage-dated." the WA has reviewed even this same wine from other vintages in the past.
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36382

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by David M. Bueker » Fri Feb 21, 2014 2:56 pm

Ah, so it's not the Sherry guy, but the unkempt beard crazy guy who wrote the note.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

John S

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1181

Joined

Thu Jun 22, 2006 2:12 am

Location

British Columbia

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by John S » Fri Feb 21, 2014 3:59 pm

It sounds like the two types of PXs made by Alvear were confused. They have made a vintage dated version since around 2000; it is a true vintage wine made from the grapes of one vintage. They also make a solera style, the traditional style; for example, the Alvear Solera 1927, where the date refers to when the solera was started (i.e., the first vintage of a blended wine from practically every vintage).
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36382

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by David M. Bueker » Fri Feb 21, 2014 8:20 pm

So I just opened a bottle of the 2011 Alvear. It's thick, syrupy and formless-not unlike Parker himself.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Victorwine » Fri Feb 21, 2014 9:14 pm

Vintage PX Sherry is usually made from grapes harvested from the grower’s oldest vines. The vines themselves might have been planted just after WW II.

Salute
no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Tom Troiano » Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:31 pm

Victorwine wrote:Vintage PX Sherry is usually made from grapes harvested from the grower’s oldest vines. The vines themselves might have been planted just after WW II.

Salute


The write up said the grapes were from WW2 not the vines.
Tom T.
no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Tom Troiano » Fri Feb 21, 2014 10:35 pm

Thanks for all the comments. One of the wines (and now I'm not sure which) got 100 Bobby points so you can bet that's contributing to the confusion among those wine retailers putting WA reviews on their website.
Tom T.
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Steve Slatcher » Sat Feb 22, 2014 1:27 pm

Both quotes are attributed to WA in various place on the interweb - google is your friend.

The second is about the 2011, but the first is about an entirely different wine:

https://www.bpwine.com/product/detail/8422xz.html
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10904

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Mon Dec 22, 2014 10:04 pm

So here is a question. I have the 2001 Alvear PX Anada, is it going to be at its best right now?
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36382

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by David M. Bueker » Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:14 pm

Pancake syrup doesn't change much over time.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Fredrik L

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

739

Joined

Sun Feb 24, 2008 5:54 pm

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Fredrik L » Tue Dec 23, 2014 7:58 am

They were grown in 2011. I checked with the bodega, but a look at the price is enough.

Greetings from Sweden / Fredrik L
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21921

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Robin Garr » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:22 am

Setting aside "pancake syrup" - I prefer to think of it as "ice-cream sundae syrup" :mrgreen: - PX is pretty much indestructible, but it also doesn't evolve to speak of. What it was, it is, and forever more shall be, within reason. I might be wary of a 25-year-old bottle, but basically, drink it whenever.
no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Victorwine » Tue Dec 23, 2014 10:57 am

Robin wrote:
Setting aside "pancake syrup" - I prefer to think of it as "ice-cream sundae syrup"

I guess that might depend on the serving temperature of the PX. Questions for David and Robin, at what (serving) temperature do you enjoy your PX?

Salute
no avatar
User

Brian K Miller

Rank

Passionate Arboisphile

Posts

9340

Joined

Fri Aug 25, 2006 1:05 am

Location

Northern California

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Brian K Miller » Tue Dec 23, 2014 11:56 am

Victorwine wrote:Robin wrote:
Setting aside "pancake syrup" - I prefer to think of it as "ice-cream sundae syrup"

I guess that might depend on the serving temperature of the PX. Questions for David and Robin, at what (serving) temperature do you enjoy your PX?

Salute



I would say it would have to be served warm enough to avoid immediately solidifying when poured over the artisanal vanilla bean gelato! :mrgreen:
...(Humans) are unique in our capacity to construct realities at utter odds with reality. Dogs dream and dolphins imagine, but only humans are deluded. –Jacob Bacharach
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36382

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by David M. Bueker » Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:43 pm

I serve PX at cellar temp.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21921

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Robin Garr » Tue Dec 23, 2014 1:08 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:I serve PX at cellar temp.

Makes sense to me. It would be really cloying served warm.
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45502

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Jenise » Tue Dec 23, 2014 1:19 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:Pancake syrup doesn't change much over time.


[Involuntary guffaw]
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Pedro Ximenez Question

by Victorwine » Wed Dec 24, 2014 12:00 am

After reading Fredrick’s response (getting a little confused) than going back to Tom’s originally post, I thought Steve did a pretty good job clearing that up. The problem lies with the way we are familiar with interoperating labels and we are not reading Sherry labels like a Spaniard would. Checking out the Alvear Bodegas website they produce several single vintage PX Sherry wines.
PX de Añada yyyy (PX of the year yyyy –year of harvest)
PX Dulce Viejo yyyy (Old sweet PX yyyy- year of harvest)
Here’s where it gets a little tricky
PX Cosecha yyyy (A single harvest PX but the yyyy does not necessarily mean year of harvest instead it represents the bottling year. According to their website the 2003 PX harvest was chosen for the PX Cosecha 2007).


The Don PX are totally different (Gifted (from God) single vintage PX aged for a minimum of 25 years)

Salute

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazonbot, APNIC Bot, Apple Bot, Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch, Ripe Bot and 1 guest

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign