The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 91,92,93,94,01 Beringer, 95 Montelena, 96 Laurel Glen

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Bill Spohn

Rank

He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'

Posts

11181

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm

Location

Vancouver BC

WTN: 91,92,93,94,01 Beringer, 95 Montelena, 96 Laurel Glen

by Bill Spohn » Sun Sep 01, 2013 2:14 pm

This is the third garden event I’ve done where people haul out some of their mature and interesting wines to taste al fresco, followed by relaxing games of bocce to calm us down from the frenzied tasting! The first two were Cornas and Cote Rotie, and the demand this time was to go American, so I specified that anything goes as long as the wines were made up of Bordeaux varietals.

We started of with a refresher:

2006 Mondavi Fume Blanc Reserve To Kalon Vineyard – the person that brought this was concerned about its age but he need not have been. Lovely smoky lemon and melon nose, and surprising complexity in the mouth with very good balance, finishing long and crisply.

The order was decided as starting with the wines less likely to be complex and work our way through to the ones we figured would be mature and the most interesting. It had worked out that when I offered to put up a couple of Beringers from my cellar, we ended up with a mini-theme with that producer.

1993 Beringer Knights Valley Cabernet – there was an interesting discussion about which of the following wines each taster preferred and why. The 93 had a very decent fruit nose, the better of the two, a little plumy. Slightly sweet entry, mellow and medium long with a soft mature finish. Best bottle I’ve had of this in several years.

1994 Beringer Knights Valley Cabernet – riper sweeter fruit in this nose, and that carried through on palate, more stuffing and acidity, and a bit more interesting on palate, but the nose was simpler than that of the 93. Both hanging in there quite nicely.

1991 Beringer Howell Mountain Bancroft Ranch Merlot – still fairly dark, but with bricking at the edges. Nose was cocoa and currant with maybe a dark cherry underlay. Big sweet entry and mellow follow through, still showing soft tannin. At, or perhaps slightly past peak, but showing well. Drink up.

At this point some latecomers showed up with wines that we judged should be slotted in before the reserves.

1996 Laurel Glen Cabernet – not that expressive in the nose until later, when some berries and cassis showed up, but a big friendly sweety in the mouth, not too ripe and with a herbal component. Solid and long.

1995 Ch. St. Jean Cinq Cepages – more immediate attraction in the nose, with nice mellow earthy expressive nose with some herbal and dark fruit. Very good balance with only soft tannins remaining, in a good place right now, as good as it will ever be and happily coasting along on plateau.

1995 Ch. Montelena Cabernet Estate – one of my favourite houses. Slightly ripe in the nose, with cassis fruit, leather and faint clean earthy notes. In the mouth power with elegance – good flavour concentration, and the tannins are certainly there as the wine is well structured, but they no longer stick out of the mix. A tasty wine also at the peak of enjoyment.

Next up were two single vineyard cabernets (only about 200 cases made) normally not sold outside the winery.

2001 Beringer Cabernet Sauvignon Rancho del Oso – ripe and dark, with a killer nose of red currant and dark chocolate and tobacco notes. Big sweet concentrated wine that drinks really well now but will hold.

2001 Beringer Cabernet Sauvignon Quarry Vineyard – very similar – black cherry and sweet cocoa nose (the better nose, I thought) and some raspberry coming in on palate. Mellow and long. Hate the touristy sprayed on gold paint labels on both of these. What next, glue some rhinestones on the bottles to catch the eye of the rubes?

Last up was a pair of reserve wines from my cellar. I have held these wines since release and this was the first time I’ve opened either of them.

1991 Beringer Private Reserve Cabernet - 40% Bancroft, 30% St Helena Home, 27% Chabot, 3% Bancroft Cabernet Franc. Still quite dark in colour, with black cherry and plum fruit and some cedar and spice as well as green hints. Sweet entry, and lots of soft tannin still evident, a stylish elegant wine, no longer hard and showing a little mint as it opened up. Very nice. Glad I waited. The bigger structure of the two. Finish goes on and on.

1992 Beringer Private Reserve Cabernet – I thought it would be fun to try these together. 57% Bancroft Ranch, 21% State Lane, 14% St. Helena Home, 5% Chabot, 3% Bancroft Cabernet Franc. Lovely nose with black cherry, vanilla, sweeter, rounder in the mouth, drinking lusciously, but still good structure underneath and no great rush (I dare say it is now at peak and will hold). So attractive it is hard to decide between the two, but I’d probably come down on the side of the 91 if forced to make a choice. Either of them would make me pretty happy on a given day!

It was a good day in the garden!

It will come as no surprise to anyone that Jenise's appie (a sort of rare beef Vietnamese salad roll) was voted best food of the day!
no avatar
User

Dale Williams

Rank

Compassionate Connoisseur

Posts

12050

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 4:32 pm

Location

Dobbs Ferry, NY (NYC metro)

Re: WTN: 91,92,93,94,01 Beringer, 95 Montelena, 96 Laurel Glen

by Dale Williams » Sun Sep 01, 2013 2:52 pm

The 91 through 94 Beringer's KVs were my favorite CalCabs (that I could afford) when I first got into wine. Havent had in ages, glad doing well (I've had several enjoyable bottles fo the 97 lately).
The Bancroft Ranch ages well for CA merlot.
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45496

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 91,92,93,94,01 Beringer, 95 Montelena, 96 Laurel Glen

by Jenise » Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:08 pm

Here come the comments!!!

Bill Spohn wrote:This is the third garden event I’ve done where people haul out some of their mature and interesting wines to taste al fresco, followed by relaxing games of bocce to calm us down from the frenzied tasting! The first two were Cornas and Cote Rotie, and the demand this time was to go American, so I specified that anything goes as long as the wines were made up of Bordeaux varietals.


Actually, not 'American' but specifically Californian. A fine point, but true.

We started of with a refresher:

2006 Mondavi Fume Blanc Reserve To Kalon Vineyard – Yes, this was very good. I don't think I'd have used the word crisp, but that's probably me on a hot day drinking room temperature white where I'd have appreciated a little more chill.

1993 and 1994 Beringer Knights Valley Cabernets – I voted for the '93 over the '94. I got that the '94 was a bit more plush, but that comparison gave the '93 a more cut, focussed presence and that, along with that lovely nose, worked best for me.

1991 Beringer Howell Mountain Bancroft Ranch Merlot – This was a joy to drink. Impressively, it was heftier than either of the younger Cabernets that preceded it, and still showing plenty of fantastic primary chocolate-covered-cherry merlot character. First Bancroft Ranch Merlot I've had since taking a bottle to the memorable black-bra offline at which I met Jim Dietz for the first time.

At this point some latecomers showed up with wines that we judged should be slotted in before the reserves.


Excuse me, but we endured three blasphemous hours on clogged Canadian freeways, resisting the temptation to turn around and go home with every grueling mile, only to be called "latecomers"? Adjectives, my friend, you need adjectives! Courageous, brave, fortitudinal in the face of exhaustion, these are the things you should mention! Man, we fought the Battle of the Ironworkers Bridge and won, bringing you Montelena and beef rolls, and all you can do is suggest we were tardy? Shame on you. :D

1996 Laurel Glen Cabernet – my glass might have gotten more areration from being next to the last pour (where yours was first), but I didn't find this reticent at all. It's my last of a series of vintages I bought in the 90's, and possibly my favorite bottle yet. Lots of cassis, with black licorice and other interesting components, and it benefitted from being kept cellar-cool in transit. Holding up very well and much better than most 96's from Sonoma's more heralded neighbor, Napa. Should hold here for years.

1995 Ch. St. Jean Cinq Cepages – Agree completely with your description.

1995 Ch. Montelena Cabernet Estate – Loved this, but especially after setting my glass aside and addressing it about an hour later. It really opened up.

2001 Beringer Cabernet Sauvignon Rancho del Oso – Agree completely with your description here. Would add that it was fuller-bodied, and more black fruited compared to the Quarry's red fruit.

2001 Beringer Cabernet Sauvignon Quarry Vineyard – Ditto.

Last up was a pair of reserve wines from my cellar. I have held these wines since release and this was the first time I’ve opened either of them.

1991 Beringer Private Reserve Cabernet - Would add to your description that this wine had that lovely caramel resonance that often kicks in when all the primary fruit resolves. I preferred it, of the two.

1992 Beringer Private Reserve Cabernet – But this was no slouch! This bottle showed more than one year younger, I thought, and would expect it to catch up to where the '91 is in 2-4 years, though it could take longer than that. Both were stunning, though. Can't wait to help you see if the next two bottles you open duplicate these findings. :wink:

It will come as no surprise to anyone that Jenise's appie (a sort of rare beef Vietnamese salad roll) was voted best food of the day!


Thanks!
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Bill Spohn

Rank

He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'

Posts

11181

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm

Location

Vancouver BC

Re: WTN: 91,92,93,94,01 Beringer, 95 Montelena, 96 Laurel Glen

by Bill Spohn » Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:25 pm

Jenise wrote:1992 Beringer Private Reserve Cabernet – But this was no slouch! This bottle showed more than one year younger, I thought, and would expect it to catch up to where the '91 is in 2-4 years, though it could take longer than that. Both were stunning, though. Can't wait to help you see if the next two bottles you open duplicate these findings. :wink:



Is there enough summer left to do the 1993 and 1994....... :twisted:
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45496

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 91,92,93,94,01 Beringer, 95 Montelena, 96 Laurel Glen

by Jenise » Sun Sep 01, 2013 3:29 pm

Bill Spohn wrote:
Jenise wrote:1992 Beringer Private Reserve Cabernet – But this was no slouch! This bottle showed more than one year younger, I thought, and would expect it to catch up to where the '91 is in 2-4 years, though it could take longer than that. Both were stunning, though. Can't wait to help you see if the next two bottles you open duplicate these findings. :wink:



Is there enough summer left to do the 1993 and 1994....... :twisted:


Sure. Enough wasps and yellow jackets, too. :)
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: APNIC Bot, Apple Bot, ClaudeBot, Facebook, iphone swarm and 14 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign