The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 1992 Penfolds Bin 389

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Bill Spohn

Rank

He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'

Posts

11173

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm

Location

Vancouver BC

WTN: 1992 Penfolds Bin 389

by Bill Spohn » Tue Aug 07, 2012 12:56 am

Every once in awhile you pull an old bottle out of the cellar and get a pleasant surprise. This cab shiraz blend has always been one of my favourirtes and I tend to give it a fair bit of age, although not always two decades.

It showed a quite dark colour, and had good legs, the nose was an enticing nutmeg and cassis, and on palate the wine was still all together, with ample warm fruit, smooth and supple. with a nice acidic lift at the end. Although there are still some soft tannins, this should be drunk sooner rather than later, but showed exceptionally well given the age.
no avatar
User

Ian Sutton

Rank

Spanna in the works

Posts

2558

Joined

Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:10 pm

Location

Norwich, UK

Re: WTN: 1992 Penfolds Bin 389

by Ian Sutton » Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:04 pm

Bill Spohn wrote:... but showed exceptionally well given the age.

and indeed a pretty much unheralded vintage (though the older I get, the more wary I am of vintage generalisations)
Drink coffee, do stupid things faster
no avatar
User

Bill Spohn

Rank

He put the 'bar' in 'barrister'

Posts

11173

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 7:31 pm

Location

Vancouver BC

Re: WTN: 1992 Penfolds Bin 389

by Bill Spohn » Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:09 pm

I liked the 1992s enought to buy 389, 707, Lehman Stonewell, Wolf Blass Black Label and Lindemans Pyrus and have enjoyed all of them. I agree that vintage reports tend to ignore very good wines from vintages that were anything but stellar.
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45484

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 1992 Penfolds Bin 389

by Jenise » Tue Aug 07, 2012 3:24 pm

Bill Spohn wrote:I liked the 1992s enought to buy 389, 707, Lehman Stonewell, Wolf Blass Black Label and Lindemans Pyrus and have enjoyed all of them. I agree that vintage reports tend to ignore very good wines from vintages that were anything but stellar.


I perceive part of that problem to be that 1) hugely ripe Oz vintages are over-rewarded and 2) that Australia is such a collection of diverse growing regions but the wine press on this side of the pond tends to lump them all together. How many thousands of miles is it between the Hunter Valley and Coonawarra, or for that matter Margaret River? California has something of the same problem--what's true in Napa isn't neccessarily true in Santa Barbara, or sometimes even Sonoma. But it's nowhere near the scale.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Ian Sutton

Rank

Spanna in the works

Posts

2558

Joined

Sun Apr 09, 2006 2:10 pm

Location

Norwich, UK

Re: WTN: 1992 Penfolds Bin 389

by Ian Sutton » Tue Aug 07, 2012 4:20 pm

Jenise
I'm certainly coming round to the idea of 1) for the warmer parts of South Australia (where the likes of Bin389, 707, WB Black Label and Stonewell are grown). Much as Aussie wine forums (and the odd critic) have lambasted Parker for his love of fruit bombs over the years, they're probably a little closer to him in style preferences than they'd like to admit. Good bold fruit seems to be a necessity to getting a good rap (well that and complete avoidance of Brett :wink: )
regards
Ian
p.s. That's not to say I can't on occasions be a luscious lush myself and enjoy a big fruited beast of a wine. 8)
Drink coffee, do stupid things faster

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, APNIC Bot, ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, iphone swarm, Mark Lipton, TikTok and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign