by Bill Hooper » Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:19 am
Normally you see roughly a 50/50 split between Malic and Tartaric acids in Germany. In 2010 it was 75% Malic, 25% Tartaric, in 2011 it was 25% Malic, 75% tartaric. Doppelsalzentsäuerung is not regulary employed in these modern times (2010 being the exception). Yields are getting lower, there is more canopy work to help to control acidity (leaf-thinning in the fruiting zone, higher canopies –or rather lower heads, green-harvesting, etc.), and there are many more measures taken to ensure that the soil is warm and loose which can lengthen the growing season considerably and help to build down acidity.
Of all of the top (VDP) estates in the Pfalz (to take but one example), I think that only 4 or 5 didn’t deacidify some wines, in some way in 2010. If they didn’t, we were seeing dry Spätlese at 12 or 13g/l. That’s tough to swallow for some people. On the other hand, the producers who didn’t (Christmann, Koehler-Ruprecht come to mind) had their best vintages that I’ve ever tasted.
Is the Bürklin-Wolf Gerümpel deacidified? I find it incredibly hard to believe that it wasn’t. One thing can hardly be disputed: Bürklin-Wolf makes among the most elegant Riesling in the world (to my taste, the most elegant in the Pfalz by some distance.) The wines are excellent and I like the estate more and more with every wine that I taste.
Anyway, thanks for the note Otto.
Cheers,
Bill
Last edited by Bill Hooper on Thu Jun 28, 2012 11:41 am, edited 1 time in total.
Wein schenkt Freude
ITB paetrawine.com