by Ben Rotter » Sat May 12, 2012 5:57 am
I remember when Rovani raised the premox issue on the eRP forum back in 2005. Whether or not corks were the issue, he certainly came across as scientifically/oenologically ignorant (or at best, logically inconsistent), and presented arguments that were not convincing (thus the reaction on that forum's thread back in 2005, which he refers to in the video).
It's true that phenolics from unclarified must provide antioxidants, but so do yeast lees. Rovani says in the video that, having used clarified must, "what antioxidants would you have? None". That is just incorrect. A must/wine with additional phenolics (sourced, for example, from skins) would have greater concentrations of antioxidants, but fermentation is an inherently "reductive" process, and the yeast lees from fermentation would certainly provide a degree of antioxidant
He says that corks can't be the issue "because everybody in the world uses the same corks". Then he goes on to suggest that the issue is a lack of oxidative protection (brought about by must clarification). But many wineries in the world use that same technique, so by the same logic must clarification can't be the issue either!
He doesn't have the answer (though he has always seemed to make out that he does), and no-one else currently seems to either.