The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

"Unique Wine"' "Distinctive Wine", "Recognizable Wine"?

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

"Unique Wine"' "Distinctive Wine", "Recognizable Wine"?

by Victorwine » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:16 pm

Wine critics classify wines as being unique, distinctive, and recognizable. What is actually meant by these terms?
I would think that a unique wine besides being highly (or at least to some degree consistently) identifiable would have to also be distinctive and recognizable. A distinctive wine would have to also be recognizable. For a wine to be distinctive does two or more features have to be identifiable? For a wine to be recognizable does only one feature have to be identifiable? Do these features have to be very specific (vineyard, producer, grape variety/or varieties) or can they be broad (village, region, country, wine type or style, unique character or characters)?

Salute

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ByteSpider, ClaudeBot, DotBot, FB-extagent and 3 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign