The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: Washington state wines

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Michael Malinoski

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

889

Joined

Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:11 pm

Location

Sudbury, MA

WTN: Washington state wines

by Michael Malinoski » Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:42 pm

Our regular tasting group got together at Jud and Lisa’s on the North Shore back in September to taste through a line-up of Washington state wines while dining on the screened-in porch and admiring one last beautiful summer sunset. It was a great evening and many of the wines came through with strong showings, I thought.

Starters:

2009 Trenz Riesling Johannisberger Hölle Kabinett Rheingau. This wine shows a tingly, almost peppery nose of green herb, pear, chalk and green apple aromas that are a bit compacted but generally pleasant. In the mouth, it comes across as a bit sweeter than the nose would suggest, with gently plump flavors of nectarine and fruit cup syrup leading to a somewhat more lifted finish. I think it best to hold and see what becomes of this in another year or two.

2009 Chateau Ste. Michelle & Dr. Loosen Riesling Columbia Valley Eroica. This wine has an entirely different personality, beginning with the broad nose that leaps out of the glass with tons of nice slate, smoke, yellow apple and cantaloupe aromas. I find it to have a whole lot of flavor density without feeling heavy or ponderous at all on the palate. There’s good life to the clean, fresh apple and citrus flavors and it all leads to a nicely-balanced finish leaving a solid impression.

The main tasting:

1999 Andrew Will Cabernet Sauvignon Klipsun Vineyard Columbia Valley. Wow, this wine hits you with an immediate and generous bouquet that fills the nostrils with aromas of dark fudgy fruit, mocha, frozen persimmon, baking spices, jalapenos and tomato plant earth tones that show fine complexity, density and sex appeal. It is also fairly rich on the palate, with a thick, velvety texture. It might lack a bit in freshness or lift but not at all in fullness of flavor or generosity of fruit. Over time, some earthier edges of green pepper, dry earth and a touch of star anise give the wine more grounding and pull everything together in a rather enjoyable package that I end up liking a good deal.

1999 Quilceda Creek Cabernet Sauvignon Washington. This wine shows off a much more fine-tuned, pedigreed and slinky set of aromatic qualities—including classy but expansive notes of black raspberry, cassis, creosote, fine leather and a kind of Bordelaise gravel and earth combination that more or less seals the deal for me. This arrangement plays out similarly in the mouth, where one finds a wonderful combination of precision and boldness of flavor allied to gravelly earthiness. I very much like the flavor profile of blackcurrant, blackberry, ash, gravel and fine green pepper that is broad and fanned out throughout the palate journey. Still, it is dense and velvety-rich, but with a muscled finesse and toned acidity that makes it finely-balanced all the way through. Tannins are there, but seem well-integrated to me, so I have no trouble recommending this for drinking now or holding another 5+ years. My WOTN.

2003 Betz Family Cabernet Sauvignon Pere de Famille Columbia Valley. One encounters a pretty exotic nose here, featuring all kinds of spicecake, nutmeg, mocha, road tar, tobacco leaf and black raspberry aromas in a plump, plush package. In the mouth, it is dominated by zesty, brambly berry fruit flavors, along with a decided streak of smoky, ashy tar. It shows good length and persistence, and I generally find myself liking it, but I find that the rich, chewy tannins sort of stick to the teeth right now—making me think it would be best to hold this a while longer to let the tannins integrate more.

2004 Betz Family Cabernet Sauvignon Pere de Famille Columbia Valley. The dominant trait on the nose of this wine is warm baked cherry fruit and an abundance of roasted coffee grounds and rich mocha notes. In the mouth, it is definitely sweeter-fruited and showing more of a roasty nature than the 2003, with lots of mocha, chocolate and black fruit flavors that still somehow manage to feel energized and lifted—with solid push and drive. It is a bolder and definitely sweeter-toned rendition than the 2003, and I like the change of pace. Even so, it is another wine I’d hold off on for a few years more, as the plush tannins are definitely still a factor.

2005 Betz Family Clos de Betz Columbia Valley. The nose of this wine is fairly dark-toned and a bit savory, featuring aromas of black currant and plum atop granite, tomato plant and a distracting sliver of tire rubber. I like it in the mouth a whole lot more, where it is suave, layered and wiry-textured, with lots of blackberry, blueberry, mocha, dusty earth and leafy underbrush flavors that combine to form interesting facets to the wine. It doesn’t carry quite the gravitas of the Pere de Famille bottlings, but I like how it blends a wider range of sensibilities into a nice and pleasant-drinking package.

2007 Andrew Will Two Blondes Vineyard Yakima Valley. The nose of this wine is loaded with big and lifted aromas of blackberries, black raspberry, tire rubber and a whole lot of black peppercorn notes. In the mouth, it is very smooth and polished, quite cool in tone and surprisingly pure and approachable at this age. It demonstrates great drive and poise, with lots of blue and purple fruit spiced by toasted oak influences. It is actually fine to drink right now, which I was not expecting.

2007 Andrew Will Ciel du Cheval Vineyard Red Mountain. In contrast, the Ciel du Cheval from the same vintage is considerably tighter and much more darkly brooding than the Two Blondes cuvee on the nose. In the mouth, it is thick and rich and very purple-fruited, with tons of spices in play (which were also evident on the nose). It has a dense, fudgy fruit core that is more tightly-coiled than its stable mate, and I would also say this wine displays more obvious structure, as well. So, while the Two Blondes is definitely the one to drink now, this wine will much more likely be the long-distance runner, in my opinion.

2003 DeLille Cellars Syrah Doyenne Yakima Valley. I liked this wine. It starts off with such a nice bouquet to it—offering up loads of pencil shavings, musky red flower petals, perfumed brambly berries, hazelnuts, leafy plants and graphite aromas that seem very nicely-balanced and appealing to me. In the mouth, it is very smoothly-textured and richly creamy, with chocolate cocoa, plum, blueberry and black currant fruit playing off of some earth and savory meat tones in a dark, cool and juicy fashion. The wine shows plenty of life and provides a solid dose of drinking pleasure.

2003 K Vintners Syrah Lucky No. 7 Walla Walla Valley. Even after being open for several hours, the nose of this wine never really opens up, staying reserved and inward-looking the whole evening long. With aggressive swirling, it does begin to show some tightly-coiled and very black aromas of charcoal sketching pencil, toasted orange peel, blackcurrant and blackberry, but that’s about it. In the mouth, it is very taut, rather fresh and lively and again entirely black-fruited and stony in personality. It displays a finely matted texture, an excellent wedge of acidity and a rock-solid structural framework. It is just so very young in tone and seems to be showing a tiny fraction of its eventual self.

2008 Rotie Cellars Southern Blend Washington. The final red of the evening leads off with a lot of smoked herb, smoked meat, peaty earth and baked red fruit aromas, followed by some slightly high-toned, volatile notes from time to time. It’s very red-fruited in the mouth, with a sort of chalky, chewy texture and some young but mild tannins showing its youthful awkwardness. It has a lot of energy and vibrancy, but comes across as rather rough-hewn at the moment, with the savory meat, earth and grilled herb flavors never quite meshing with the chocolate and red fruit notes. I think it has the tension to hold a while, so let’s hope it integrates more with some time in the cellar.

Sweet wines:

2005 Chateau Ste. Michelle Chenin Blanc Late Harvest Horse Heaven Hills. This was a nice wine. To me, the very first aromatic note was a dead-on smell of quince paste, which was then followed by some rather fun notes of white currants, tropical fruits, lavender and clover honey that rounded out a delightful and unusual bouquet. I again encounter the quince flavors on the palate, along with some interesting wooliness—though here the profile is a bit more one-noted. Still, I really like the fullness of body, the fine balance and the reasonable sweetness of the wine and would like to try it again in a few years to see what some additional aging does to it.

2003 Lafaurie-Peyraguey Sauternes. It was dark, my hands were cold, and my note reads simply “amazingly intense botrytis” and that is it. My memory fills in with apricot jam, caramel and honey to go with tropical dried fruit. I’ve had this luscious and luxuriant wine maybe 4 other times and it is always delicious.


-Michael
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45478

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: Washington state wines

by Jenise » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:11 pm

Michael, I always love your notes. Some thoughts:

The 99 Quilceda sounds majestic. I see a lot of descriptors I wish I'd thought to use in my own notes on last weekend's tasting.

Re the Andrew Wills: a few weeks ago at an industry tasting I got to sample his line-up of 08's. They're superb: rich and layered yet showing a dignified restraint with many savory, Bordeauxish elements.

Re the Betzes, I was really surprised by your results. To put it in a nutshell, I would have expected to see your note re the 04 Pere, "It is a bolder and definitely sweeter-toned rendition than the 2003", pointed the other direction as 03 was such a hot vintage and 04 much cooler.

And finally I'm glad you liked the Doyenne. I'm not much of a syrah drinker but I was so impressed with the 03 I've added more to my cellar. I believe that was only DeLille's second vintage of this, and it was a great success right from the start. Look for their 08 if you want to try a Washington syrah that shows true Northern Rhone character.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Jim Grow

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1261

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 11:31 am

Location

Rockbridge Ohio

Re: WTN: Washington state wines

by Jim Grow » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:41 pm

Hi Michael, How much decant time did you give those Wash. reds? I have a couple of bottles of the 07 Andrew Will Ciel du Cheval and have been iching to open one
no avatar
User

Michael Malinoski

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

889

Joined

Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:11 pm

Location

Sudbury, MA

Re: WTN: Washington state wines

by Michael Malinoski » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:45 pm

Thanks a lot, Jenise!

I really like your descriptors of the 2008 Andrew Will line-up. I think much the same could be said about that pair of 2007's we drank.

On the topic of the 2003 vs. 2004 Betz Pere de Famille wines, I hope you don't mind if I post notes from a friend who is not on this board, just to show I wasn't the only one who felt this way: :)

2003 Betz Family Cabernet Sauvignon Père de Famille – Brambly dark fruit, tobacco, cool earth, limestone and just a hint of brett on the nose. Tannins definitely still young and firm, but not overwhelming. More restrained than the 2004 we drank next to it, but very nice and a slight nod.

2004 Betz Family Cabernet Sauvignon Père de Famille – Much different than the 2003 we drank next to it. Lots of roasted coffee, mocha and much blacker, riper fruit on the nose with just a little brett. Bigger, bolder and sweeter on the palate. Very nice, but I actually liked the 03 a little better.

Interestingly, I found the 2003 Andrew Will Sorella a little while back to have a lot of the same spicecake and mace sorts of notes as the 2003 Betz PdF, and also a good streak of acidity I wouldn't necessarily expect from such a warm year. Both wines seem to have done well in those conditions!

2003 Andrew Will Sorella Columbia Valley. This wine is a really inky purple color, but manages a relatively crisp aromatic profile of spiced plums, Christmas candles, dusty rubber, cool mint leaves and blackcurrants. In the mouth, this is decidedly fresher and much more lively all around than the 2002—with more lift and a crunchier acid profile to offset the voluptuous black and purple fruits. The wine shows no signs of heat and isn’t even particularly tannic—it is just young and energetic. It was definitely my favorite of the two Sorella vintages.

-Michael
no avatar
User

Michael Malinoski

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

889

Joined

Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:11 pm

Location

Sudbury, MA

Re: WTN: Washington state wines

by Michael Malinoski » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:53 pm

Hi Jim,

A few of the wines were decanted for sediment early on, but for the most part these were just opened up and poured over the course of the long evening. I believe the 2 Andrew Will wines were open about 2.5 - 3 hours by the time I got around to them (and I think I was the last to pour them). I could definitely see decanting just about all of them, but we didn't really have the tools to do that!

As I mentioned in my notes, the 07 Ciel du Cheval is the one I think will most reward additional cellaring, so sorry to defer your itchy trigger finger on that! I'd wait at least a few more years and would still probably suggest a good decanting.

-Michael
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45478

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: Washington state wines

by Jenise » Mon Nov 07, 2011 7:06 pm

Michael Malinoski wrote:I really like your descriptors of the 2008 Andrew Will line-up. I think much the same could be said about that pair of 2007's we drank.


I would expect that; though I would also expect higher alcohol on the 07's unless they picked early.

I definitely believe you re 03 and 04. You need to understand that we moved up here in 2003 and that was the first vintage that I could say I had a comprehensive understanding of. The leaner 04's to follow were, then, almost a shock to my system, but closer to my Bordeaux-lovers norm so not unhappily so, though the kind of stuffing that makes a wine long-lived is, or has been in every other instance I'm aware of, certainly the 03. Of which I own a number. My latest WineBid shipment contained a few more: one of the very Betz's we're discussing, I'm happy to report, also another Doyenne ($20 a bottle--insane QPR), and some Long Shadow's Pirouettes.
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Lou Kessler

Rank

Doesn't buy green bananas

Posts

3517

Joined

Fri Mar 24, 2006 3:20 pm

Re: WTN: Washington state wines

by Lou Kessler » Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:14 pm

Thanks, for your notes. I've got a couple of bottles 95 & 96 Quilceda cabs left in my cellar. I had never been too impressed with them as I thought they were too oaky for my palate. I'll have to try one now, maybe they have integrated more of that new oak.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazon, APNIC Bot, ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch, SemrushBot and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign