The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Impromptu Brunello night

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Michael Malinoski

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

889

Joined

Thu Sep 21, 2006 5:11 pm

Location

Sudbury, MA

Impromptu Brunello night

by Michael Malinoski » Thu Oct 20, 2011 8:22 pm

A couple of Fridays back, a late afternoon e-mail soon turned into an impromptu poker game at my house, with 4 of us playing some Texas Hold ‘Em and drinking some good wines.

2005 Vollenweider Riesling Wolfer Goldgrube Spatlese Mosel. Pungently plump, dense and generous on the nose, this wine features lovely aromas of sweet citrus, lemonball candy, sweet chalk dust, candy cigarettes and a strong streak of petrol. In the mouth, it is lush and creamy, with a dynamic interplay between the sweet apple, pear and tropical fruit flavors and some zesty spritz and acidity. It feels seamless, a tad decadent, deliciously-flavored and plenty driven. It’s really an excellent Spatlese, in my opinion.

1999 Antinori Brunello di Montalcino Pian delle Vigne. Initially, this wine is wide open for business on the nose. It offers up delightful aromas of crushed red flowers, sappy red cherry, sweet licorice rope, fresh-laid road tar, chocolate, and dusty oak. In the mouth, though, I don’t like it nearly as much, as there’s an odd acrid streak running through the middle of the wine that detracts right from the start. There’s loads of black cherry fruit, but that bitter charcoal, green oak, green pepper and raw cedar vein just doesn’t work for me. Although the wine’s tannins do soften up a bit over time and those ungainly elements do slowly begin to better integrate, it also turns increasingly sticky and sweetly warm-fruited. On day 2, the nose isn’t nearly so nice, but the palate seems a tad more sorted out and mainstream, so I’m not quite sure what advice to give about this wine just now, frankly.

1999 Castello Banfi Brunello di Montalcino. This is both darker in color and darker in tone than the Antinori. It offers up penetrating aromas of black cherries, fireplace embers, tar, toasted orange peel and oak that grow more complex over time, but also tend to let the wood influence shine through a bit more. In the mouth, it is again fairly dark in tone by comparison—with strong flavors of black licorice, blackberries, black currant and dark earth. It has a distinct sweetness to it at times, but I don’t mind that a whole lot, especially since the texture here is so smooth and polished. Overall, it was sort of the middle of the road of this trio.

2002 Marchesi de Frescobaldi Brunello di Montalcino Castelgiocondo. The nose of the third Brunello is markedly earthier in tone—with slightly murky but mysterious bits of sour cherry, potting soil, persimmon, ash, leather and fur aromas in play. In the mouth, it is definitely the most traditionally-made of these three, with a lot of character and solid balance all the way through. The flavors of sour cherry, currants, chocolate, leather and earth are quite tasty and are carried along by fine sour-tinged acidity. There are still some polished tannins to contend with on the finish, but this is really nice to drink right now. I think it was pretty unanimous that this was the most enjoyable wine of the three.

1996 Vietti Barolo Castiglione. The color of this wine is a tad tawny and and bricking around the edges. Initially, everyone started out by commenting on the strong Girl Scout mint cookie aromas this exudes upon opening! But that fades pretty quickly and yields to the more dominant and persistently traditional aromas of dark earth, blended spices, dried red flowers, black leather and dark fruits—along with a high-toned acetone streak that adds more complexity, rather than detracting from the overall enjoyment. On the palate, the wine exhibits excellent sour cherry flavor intensity to go with some Christmas ribbon candy, earth and caramel complexity delivered across a rather Old World styled structure of dry acidity and firm but unobtrusive tannin. It is full of fine flavor delivered in waves of fruit and earth tones and always feels controlled, balanced and finely-toned. In structure, it still feels quite youthful, while in flavor and texture it feels nicely resolved—a really nice combination for my tastes. So, I think it is fine to drink now or hold a while longer, depending on your own preferences.

2008 Dusted Valley Vintners Cabernet Franc Columbia Valley. A few caveats on this wine: It is closed with a screwcap, it was initially opened two nights earlier, and Zach’s main reason for buying it was to get the free t-shirt that came with it. I’m sure the t-shirt is nice, but the wine really isn’t. It smells of oak, oak and more oak, with maybe some green pepper and pencil shavings in there, as well. On the palate, it is a bit hot, with dark cherry, sweet caramel and mentholated wood flavors simultaneously coating and burning the tongue.

N.V. Chambers Rosewood Muscadelle (Tokay) Rutherglen. This was from a bottle purchased in 2002. It is brown in color and totally coats the inside of the glass like molasses. It is loaded with aromas of raisins, dates, iced tea, spicecake and caramel and tastes of Fig Newton filling, caramel candy and raisins. It coats the tongue and is dense and rich in the extreme, with a fun sweet core to it. In subsequent days, it mellows out a bit and starts to show off more of its acidic backbone, which was largely obscured the first night. I like it both ways, actually.


-Michael
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36369

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Impromptu Brunello night

by David M. Bueker » Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:01 am

Interesting notes. The 2001-2005 Vollenweider wines are some of the most immediately enjoyable Rieslings in the cellar. The later wines not quite so much. 2006 is big and burly (not shocking), but I find 2007 too soft and fat to be refreshing.

Brunello is a puzzle to me. I'm never quite sure what I will get when I open a bottle.

Thanks for the 1996 Barolo note. I opened a 1996 Marcarini Brunate the other week, and it was developing well aromatically, but still very tight on the palate.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Rainer from CH

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

163

Joined

Tue Sep 14, 2010 2:35 pm

Re: Impromptu Brunello night

by Rainer from CH » Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:40 pm

David M. Bueker wrote:Brunello is a puzzle to me. I'm never quite sure what I will get when I open a bottle.


Brunello is really a minefield. But these two producers are very reliable since 1997:
- Ciacci Piccolomini d'Aragona Brunello di Montalcino
- La Fiorita Brunello di Montalcino

Cheers,
Rainer

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot, APNIC Bot, Bing [Bot], ClaudeBot, DotBot, Google AgentMatch, TikTok and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign