[quote="Bill Spohn"]Notes from a dinner at home.
1994 Bourillon d’Orleans Vouvray Sec Vielles Vignes – I liked this a lot; a real fascinator. Probably the oldest dry chenin I've ever had and it had gone to a place I couldn't have expected. Very dry, as you, and my first taste was salt followed by coconut. After ruling out riesling, semillon and chenin blanc were my next thoughts, in that order. The butterscotch element developed in the glass and was soon joined by the lemon oil you mention.
Ruinart ‘R’ Brut NV– Burnished gold in color, nose of brioche and baked red apple with caramel taffy tones on the palate. I alone preferred this to the next bubbly, although I recognize that technically speaking the other was the better wine. I just love this style of old champagne, that's all.
Montaudon Classe ‘M’ Green apple here vs. the other's red, with citrus and allspice. Higher acid, more persistent bubble, and more freshness than the first. Interesting complexity considering that you report that the wine, when young, was apparently just like the other young Montaudons I've had. Would never have guessed that those had this kind of future in front of them. Bless you for aging these NV's!
1993 Dom. Jean et JL Trapet Gevrey Chambertin – Darker in the glass as well as heavier and earthier, but what it had in weight it lacked in complexity and finesse. Good though, considering it's age.
1993 Dom. du Clos Frantin (Bichot) Vosne Romanée – A clear mauvy-light red color. Very delicate with tea, red currants and spice--I smelled and tasted this before the first one, and my thoughts went to old barbaresco before the first wine convinced me they were most likely both pinots, which Coop of course guessed. My favorite of the two as well.
2001 Karl Lawrence Napa Cabernet – I'm torn on your description. Yeah, I knew what it was because I brought it, but I gave it more points for complexity than you did. At least, within the context of straight Napa cabernets. Blackberry, tobacco, licorice and cocoa notes also suggested cabernet to me. Is it because it was my wine that I didn't think it showed any syrah character, or is it because you (well, and David too) were possibly expecting syrah that you were trying to make that shoe fit? We'll never know.
2004 Dom. Charvin Chateauneuf du Pape – Agree that it was no trouble pegging this one. In fact, overall I agree with your assessment, though I'd replace 'blackberry' with 'raspberry' and emphasize the herbal component. Because of that, where I thought David's wine was a better match for the plate, I though the KL was the best match with the lamb/hoisin combo. Would never have recognized this 04 based on my experience with the 05, btw.
1983 Guntrum Oppenheimer Sacktrager Gewurztraminer Auslese – This was quite tasty, but I honestly wouldn't have ever guessed it to be either gewurz or an auslese. Too bad it's your last one, would be a great bottle to open with your next curry take-out.
2000 Albert Mann Gewurztraminer Altenbourg Vendage Tardives – What you said, with a bit of clove and fig newton thrown in. Outstanding.