The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

SFChron: Bonne On Calif Whites

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8373

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

SFChron: Bonne On Calif Whites

by TomHill » Mon Aug 29, 2011 10:13 am

JonBonne writes on a new age for Calif whites in ystrday's Chron:
SFChron:BonneOnWhites

This is an extremely well written article that you seldom see in wine writing these days.
Tom
no avatar
User

Mark Lipton

Rank

Oenochemist

Posts

4728

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:18 pm

Location

Indiana

Re: SFChron: Bonne On Calif Whites

by Mark Lipton » Mon Aug 29, 2011 1:00 pm

TomHill wrote:JonBonne writes on a new age for Calif whites in ystrday's Chron:
SFChron:BonneOnWhites

This is an extremely well written article that you seldom see in wine writing these days.


Thanks for the link, Tom. Got to taste the Arnot-Roberts version of that wine when I visited them in the Spring. Very nice, but I worry what prices these field blend whites will go for.

Mark Lipton
no avatar
User

wnissen

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1297

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:16 pm

Location

Livermore, CA

Re: SFChron: Bonne On Calif Whites

by wnissen » Wed Aug 31, 2011 11:51 pm

I really enjoyed the writing of this article (I thank my lucky stars every time I see a byline that isn't W. Blake Grey) but I have a question about the tasting notes. Specifically, Napa-Sonoma Counties Sauvignon Blanc, 14.1%. "Acidity from a lean vintage..." Russian River Valley, 14.5%. "Acidity adds an edge..." Amador County Verdelho, 14.1%. "...a limpid texture that adds weight to the grape's lime-rickey tartness." Napa Valley, 14%. "...electric acidity, which adds a pleasing bite."

Is it really possible that these 14%+ wines from warm areas have decent acidity? Cause that would really be a second coming of California white wines... Usually 14% is my cue that I'm about to taste an acidity-free ooze monster, but then again I'm also gunning for my membership in the anti-flavor wine elite.

Walt
Walter Nissen
no avatar
User

TomHill

Rank

Here From the Very Start

Posts

8373

Joined

Wed Mar 29, 2006 12:01 pm

Re: SFChron: Bonne On Calif Whites

by TomHill » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:28 am

wnissen wrote:I really enjoyed the writing of this article (I thank my lucky stars every time I see a byline that isn't W. Blake Grey) but I have a question about the tasting notes. Specifically, Napa-Sonoma Counties Sauvignon Blanc, 14.1%. "Acidity from a lean vintage..." Russian River Valley, 14.5%. "Acidity adds an edge..." Amador County Verdelho, 14.1%. "...a limpid texture that adds weight to the grape's lime-rickey tartness." Napa Valley, 14%. "...electric acidity, which adds a pleasing bite."
Is it really possible that these 14%+ wines from warm areas have decent acidity? Cause that would really be a second coming of California white wines... Usually 14% is my cue that I'm about to taste an acidity-free ooze monster, but then again I'm also gunning for my membership in the anti-flavor wine elite.
Walt


Yeah...I noticed that too, Walt. I would guess that there was acid added at fermentation.
Tom
no avatar
User

Brian Gilp

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1440

Joined

Tue May 23, 2006 5:50 pm

Re: SFChron: Bonne On Calif Whites

by Brian Gilp » Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:36 am

In just a few years of growing grapes at my home, I have seen enough variance in sugar, TA, pH levels to tell you that its quite possible. I have no idea about the specific wines, however, 14% alc is only 24 brix if one gets there directly instead of picking at higher brix and watering back or some other method to reduce alc. Depending upon the grape, location and canopy management is it definetly possible to have natural acidity and 14% alc from 24 brix grapes.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], ClaudeBot, FB-extagent, Google AgentMatch, Yandexbot and 3 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign