The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

WTN: 2009s

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9802

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

WTN: 2009s

by Rahsaan » Fri Mar 25, 2011 10:58 pm

2009 Pernot Volnay Carelle Sous La Chapelle
I experimented with different aeration strategies on different bottles and my conclusion was: The More Air the Better. Right now it’s a tight taut crunchy raw young wine but there seems to be sufficient material (for my tastes) to unwind a bit and show some different sides in the future. And there is enough juicy deliciousness here for those who like young Burgundies. Does anyone know how this bottling usually ages?

2009 Baudry Chinon Grézeaux
Tons of deep dark ripe fruit. I know everyone’s been tasting this wine recently, at home, in restaurants, at the LDM road show, while sleeping. It just keeps giving. Typical Grézeaux tobacco/vegetal/coffee bean notes (that’s how I describe them, obviously) overlaid with lots of succulent cabernet franc fruit. Yet of course the tannins are focused and the wine is sturdy. Impressive wine, but oh so primary right now.

2009 Huet Vouvray Le Mont Sec
Another young-un. I preferred this on day two when it was more focused and tingly on the tongue. Not that it was a slouch on day one, it just showed more of the dense fruit. Something to watch.

2009 Huet Vouvray Le Haut Lieu Sec
This on the other hand, I’ve been drinking at various speeds over various lengths of time and it seems to ring my bells the hardest on day one. So much pungent zingy crystal bite, it invites the tongue to swim. I like swimming.

2009 Tavijn Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato
This is almost my perfect dinner party wine for non-geeks. It has plenty of dark fruit (bowls of the stuff) that gushes immediately after pouring so no need for complicated aeration timing schemes. Yet it also has plenty of delicate floral notes dancing on top of the wine which keep me interested and intrigued while others just drink. Plus there is enough tannin to keep it firm and ready for food. The only downside is the alcohol, 14%. So when the others call it quits and I keep going (I told you it was intriguing), it has a tendency to come on too strong. I guess we can’t have it all.
no avatar
User

James Roscoe

Rank

Chat Prince

Posts

11069

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:43 pm

Location

D.C. Metro Area - Maryland

Re: WTN: 2009s

by James Roscoe » Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:26 am

So 2009 was a good vintage in the Loire and Burgundy as well as the Rhone? Thanks for the notes.
Yes, and how many deaths will it take 'til he knows
That too many people have died?
The answer, my friend, is blowin' in the wind
The answer is blowin' in the wind.
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9802

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Rahsaan » Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:03 pm

James Roscoe wrote:So 2009 was a good vintage in the Loire and Burgundy as well as the Rhone?


I'm certainly not an expert but from everything I've read (and the bits that I've tasted) 2009 was similarly ripe and forward in the Loire, Burgundy, and the Rhone. Some folks might think certain wines are too big and round, but it certainly wasn't like 2003.
no avatar
User

Tim York

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

4979

Joined

Tue May 09, 2006 2:48 pm

Location

near Lisieux, France

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Tim York » Sat Mar 26, 2011 12:45 pm

Some lovely wines there. I must get over to the importer of Huet and Baudry in Liège before he runs out.
Tim York
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9802

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Rahsaan » Sat Mar 26, 2011 1:46 pm

Tim York wrote:Some lovely wines there. I must get over to the importer of Huet and Baudry in Liège before he runs out.


Yes you must! One can never have enough of these producers in the cellar. (If only I had a proper cellar!)
no avatar
User

Jenise

Rank

FLDG Dishwasher

Posts

45476

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 2:45 pm

Location

The Pacific Northest Westest

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Jenise » Sat Mar 26, 2011 6:57 pm

The 04 Grezeaux is the only one of that Baudry I've ever had. It's surprisingly ripe and giving considering the year--no one I pour it for ever guesses, and more black fruit-driven than seems typical of Baudry but which, judging by your tobacco and coffee bean, may be typical of Grezeaux. I've wondered about that, since it otherwise seems rather atypical of the vintage (ripe for same).
My wine shopping and I have never had a problem. Just a perpetual race between the bankruptcy court and Hell.--Rogov
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9802

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Rahsaan » Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:07 pm

Jenise wrote:The 04 Grezeaux is the only one of that Baudry I've ever had. It's surprisingly ripe and giving considering the year--no one I pour it for ever guesses, and more black fruit-driven than seems typical of Baudry but which, judging by your tobacco and coffee bean, may be typical of Grezeaux. I've wondered about that, since it otherwise seems rather atypical of the vintage (ripe for same).


Yes, something about the black fruit and vegetal/tobacco/pungency seems to be consistent in all the Grezeaux I've ever had. Not sure where the character comes from but it is the clearest terroir/cuvee stamp of all of his wines in my opinion.
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10904

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:52 am

Huet update from the good Wine Doctor>>>>>>

http://www.thewinedoctor.com/tastingsfo ... 2011.shtml
no avatar
User

Bob Parsons Alberta

Rank

aka Doris

Posts

10904

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 3:09 pm

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Bob Parsons Alberta » Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:24 am

no avatar
User

Mark S

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1174

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:28 pm

Location

CNY

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Mark S » Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:20 pm

Rahsaan wrote:2009 Tavijn Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato
This is almost my perfect dinner party wine for non-geeks...



Really? Aren't non-geeks turned off by it's excessive floral (almost literally like perfume on bottle I had before) quality?
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9802

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Rahsaan » Wed Apr 27, 2011 8:42 pm

Mark S wrote:
Rahsaan wrote:2009 Tavijn Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato
This is almost my perfect dinner party wine for non-geeks...



Really? Aren't non-geeks turned off by it's excessive floral (almost literally like perfume on bottle I had before) quality?


Are you talking about the 2009? I wouldn't call the floral component excessive. It's not gewurztraminer or anything. Maybe the non-geeks have been holding their criticism but the combination of juicy easy fruit, structure, and flavor detail has made this wine a very easy sell. I've had about six so far and just bought two more for a dinner party at a friend's house.

As always, different strokes...

But, it is true, there are probably better wines to appeal to a mass audience. This one is my perfect dinner party wine for non-geeks because it manages to please me at the same time!
no avatar
User

Mark S

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1174

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 4:28 pm

Location

CNY

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Mark S » Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:56 pm

Rahsaan wrote:
Mark S wrote:
Rahsaan wrote:2009 Tavijn Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato
This is almost my perfect dinner party wine for non-geeks...



Really? Aren't non-geeks turned off by it's excessive floral (almost literally like perfume on bottle I had before) quality?


Are you talking about the 2009? I wouldn't call the floral component excessive.


No, not the '09. Geez, I would have to look at my notes to see when I recalled it (could have been the 2005?), I liked it, but thought it wasn't to everyone's taste.
no avatar
User

Rahsaan

Rank

Wild and Crazy Guy

Posts

9802

Joined

Tue Mar 28, 2006 8:20 pm

Location

New York, NY

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Rahsaan » Wed Apr 27, 2011 10:57 pm

Mark S wrote:No, not the '09. Geez, I would have to look at my notes to see when I recalled it (could have been the 2005?), I liked it, but thought it wasn't to everyone's taste.


I haven't tasted a ton of vintages but to my brief memory the 09 has a juicy layer of friendly fruit that makes it much easier to like.
no avatar
User

Charles Weiss

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

444

Joined

Tue Mar 21, 2006 6:47 pm

Location

Boston

Re: WTN: 2009s

by Charles Weiss » Thu Apr 28, 2011 7:18 am

Rahsaan wrote:
Mark S wrote:
Rahsaan wrote:2009 Tavijn Ruché di Castagnole Monferrato
This is almost my perfect dinner party wine for non-geeks...

But, it is true, there are probably better wines to appeal to a mass audience. This one is my perfect dinner party wine for non-geeks because it manages to please me at the same time!


I've only had the 2004, but I think I understand. It was the nose that was unique and interesting. There was plenty of attractive fruit on the palate but not pushing the envelope in any way for someone drinking it without paying much attention.

Charles

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, Amazonbot, Baidu [Spider], ClaudeBot, Dale Williams, Google Adsense [Bot], LACNIC160, PetalBot, Ripe Bot and 2 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign