No question about it. It wasn't marginal taint, it was right out front. Mary picked it up as quickly as I did. We turned and looked at each other with expressions of horror before either of us uttered the "C" word.
But here's the kicker: <I>The wine was stoppered with a synthetic cork!</I> It was the Neocork/Nomacork type, a foamy cylinder in a smooth synthetic sleeve. This one was designed to look as much like a natural cork as possible, with a pale-tan cork color and an old-fashioned, simple inked-on design. But injecting it with TCA? That's probably a step farther than Trimbach would go for authenticity.

So what's going on here? Anyone care to venture any hypotheses?
We kicked this around in Chat earlier, and everyone was pretty much befuddled.
Random thoughts:
* Barrel taint? But does this light, fruity-style Pinot Blanc see oak? Trimbach's Website, unfortunately, is not informative. But I sure haven't heard any tales of widespread TCA issues at Trimbach, and if there was widespread taint in the winery or barrel program, I'd think that would be widely known by now.
* 2002 vintage issues? The cold wet late summer that was so bad in the Rhone wasn't a factor in Alsace ... was it?
* Four years under synthetic just too long? The conventional wisdom is growing that these "corks" are best used for only a year or two, and that could explain some of the muted fruit. But TCA?
Anybody have more cogent theories? Have there been other reports of problems at Trimbach that I've missed? What the heck is going on here?