The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Tasting notes from the Ridge

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

califusa

Rank

Wine geek

Posts

23

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:47 pm

Location

Napa

Tasting notes from the Ridge

by califusa » Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:17 pm

2008 Chardonnay Santa Cruz Mountains Estate 100% Chardonnay 14.4%alc $40

Pretty pale bronze color - mineral driven, wet creek stone aromatics - lovely forward fruit, mostly white stone fruit flavors - broadening mouthfeel, bright acids, clean finish - more forward drinkability than previous editions, likely a function of the vintage, I think. You can take it home for dinner tonight - an elegant and most pleasurable wine.

2008 Geyserville 72% Zinfandel 20% Carignan 6% Petite Sirah 2% Mataro 14.8%alc $35 20% new oak

Deep ruby color - shy purple plum aromas with hints of spice - smooth and bright on the palate with mouth coating texture and a long finish - may evolve into a classic Geezer - needs time.

2005 Grenache Lytton Estate 88% Grenache 6% Petite Sirah 6% Zinfandel 14.6%alc $28 ATP

Ripely sweet and bright red stone fruit aromatics - friendly entry with smartly refreshing acids - rather pretty and fun to drink - becomes noticeably more integrated with time and air.

2006 Grenache/Syrah Lytton Estate 50% Grenache 50% Syrah 14.8%alc 44 barrels produced $28 ATP

Dense garnet color - Syrah predominates in the nose with meaty overtones - the flavors follow the aromatics with the Grenache tempering what would otherwise be a monster Syrah - still rather tannic - will easily improve for 5 years, probably more.

2007 Cabernet Santa Cruz Mountains Estate 58% Cabernet Sauvignon 42% Merlot 13.3%alc $40

Beautiful primary Cabernet and plummy Merlot aromas with a nuance of heady perfume - smooth, smooth entry with palate coating texture - a real beauty - fabulous now, but should evolve into something equally, yet differently wonderful. Available discounted in the retail market and a true value.

2007 Monte Bello 79% Cabernet Sauvignon 10% Merlot 9% Petite Verdot 2% Cabernet Franc 13.1%alc 213 tons from 103 acres 41% selected for this wine $145

Bright, rich and ripe fruit aromas with just a hint of dusty minerality - rich and full on the palate with wonderful presence and balance - will become a classic Monte Bello. Eric Baugher suggests 10-20 years in the cellar for full development - should go 30 or more.

The "physiologically ripe" wonks should taste these two offerings - both centered in the "table wine" alcohol levels - they answer, most eloquently, the rationale offered by some of the oak juice syrup producers.

1996 Petite Sirah Geyserville 100% Petite Sirah 14.5%alc 31 barrels produced ATP

A one time only wine from a warm vintage that produced enough of the varietal of high enough quality to warrant a separate bottling. Deep and dark in the glass with dusty black stone fruit aromas - rich and flavorful in the mouth with not insignificant tannins on the back end that creep forward on the palate as the wine airs. A fascinating counterpoint to the many PS from York Creek, this offering needs at least another decade (at least two for my palate) to show the marvelous potential of the variety when grown and vinted by the right hands. One of the little noticed ATP gems.
Last edited by califusa on Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Allan Bree
Napa
www.batonnage.net
no avatar
User

James Dietz

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1236

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:45 pm

Location

Orange County, California

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by James Dietz » Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:22 pm

Those Santa Cruz bottlings can age beautifully. I've had a few of the 1991 and 1995, and they have been stunning. For the price, easily one of the best buys in CA Cab. Thanx for the report on the 2007... and on the Monte Bello, another classic CA wine that remains relatively reasonably priced.
Cheers, Jim
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36368

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by David M. Bueker » Mon Feb 21, 2011 1:42 pm

Thanks for the report. That seems to be an unusually high % of Carignan for the Geyserville.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

califusa

Rank

Wine geek

Posts

23

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:47 pm

Location

Napa

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by califusa » Mon Feb 21, 2011 10:31 pm

Thank you, Jim.

You are correct, David - that's a lot of Carignan - but it works beautifully in this wine. Of course, it's not as much as the 30% in the 91 - the blend in that vintage forced Ridge into what became the decision to go with proprietary names for the Monte Bello, Lytton Springs and Geyserville bottlings.
Allan Bree
Napa
www.batonnage.net
no avatar
User

Joe Moryl

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

990

Joined

Tue Aug 14, 2007 9:38 pm

Location

New Jersey, USA

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by Joe Moryl » Mon Feb 21, 2011 11:01 pm

James Dietz wrote:Those Santa Cruz bottlings can age beautifully. I've had a few of the 1991 and 1995, and they have been stunning. For the price, easily one of the best buys in CA Cab. Thanx for the report on the 2007... and on the Monte Bello, another classic CA wine that remains relatively reasonably priced.


You are kidding about Monte Bello remaining reasonably priced, no?
no avatar
User

James Dietz

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1236

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:45 pm

Location

Orange County, California

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by James Dietz » Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:49 am

Joe Moryl wrote:
James Dietz wrote:Those Santa Cruz bottlings can age beautifully. I've had a few of the 1991 and 1995, and they have been stunning. For the price, easily one of the best buys in CA Cab. Thanx for the report on the 2007... and on the Monte Bello, another classic CA wine that remains relatively reasonably priced.


You are kidding about Monte Bello remaining reasonably priced, no?


I did say relatively.. certainly compared to other premium Ca Cabs and to other age-worthy Bdx wines. I can buy them in the secondary market for well less than $100, typically. Even classic vintages, like the 1991, are available for around $150. Expensive? Sure. But worth it, at least to me.
Cheers, Jim
no avatar
User

Patrick Martin

Rank

Ultra geek

Posts

370

Joined

Tue Dec 14, 2010 2:28 am

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by Patrick Martin » Tue Feb 22, 2011 2:24 am

The 2007 Geyserville was 22% Carignane, 18% Petite Syrah, and 2% Mataro!
no avatar
User

David M. Bueker

Rank

Childless Cat Dad

Posts

36368

Joined

Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am

Location

Connecticut

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by David M. Bueker » Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:28 pm

Patrick Martin wrote:The 2007 Geyserville was 22% Carignane, 18% Petite Syrah, and 2% Mataro!


Funny you should bring that up, as I was rather rudely scolded elsewhere for bringing up the rather wide variation in grape percentages in Geyserville and Lytton. Yes in most years both hover at 70-75% zin, but sometimes they go much higher or lower.
Decisions are made by those who show up
no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by Tom Troiano » Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:31 pm

califusa wrote:forced Ridge into what became the decision to go with proprietary names for the Monte Bello, Lytton Springs and Geyserville bottlings.


Monte Bello has never had less than the min. required amount of Cabernet, has it?
Tom T.
no avatar
User

Robin Garr

Rank

Forum Janitor

Posts

21919

Joined

Fri Feb 17, 2006 1:44 pm

Location

Louisville, KY

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by Robin Garr » Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:43 pm

James Dietz wrote:I did say relatively.. certainly compared to other premium Ca Cabs and to other age-worthy Bdx wines. I can buy them in the secondary market for well less than $100, typically. Even classic vintages, like the 1991, are available for around $150. Expensive? Sure. But worth it, at least to me.

I'm with you on that ... although I rarely buy either, both Ridge Monte Bello and Laurel Glen Sonoma Mountain Estate Cabernet strike me as two classics that aren't cheap but whose producers have maintained a touch of sanity in an insane market.
no avatar
User

califusa

Rank

Wine geek

Posts

23

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 5:47 pm

Location

Napa

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by califusa » Tue Feb 22, 2011 12:44 pm

The 2001 contained 56% Cabernet, 36% Merlot and 8% Petite Verdot. It's likely there have been others with less than 75% Cabernet Sauvignon.
Allan Bree
Napa
www.batonnage.net
no avatar
User

Tom Troiano

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1244

Joined

Mon Mar 27, 2006 4:22 pm

Location

Massachusetts

Re: Tasting notes from the Ridge

by Tom Troiano » Tue Feb 22, 2011 1:05 pm

califusa wrote:The 2001 contained 56% Cabernet, 36% Merlot and 8% Petite Verdot. It's likely there have been others with less than 75% Cabernet Sauvignon.


interesting. Thanks.

I think Ridge MB and Ch. Montelena are two high priced Cal Cabs that are definitely worth the money. I'd say "QPR" but I tried that once with Yquem and got laughed at.
Tom T.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch, TikTok and 7 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign