
James Dietz
Wine guru
1236
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:45 pm
Orange County, California
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36368
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
James Dietz wrote:Those Santa Cruz bottlings can age beautifully. I've had a few of the 1991 and 1995, and they have been stunning. For the price, easily one of the best buys in CA Cab. Thanx for the report on the 2007... and on the Monte Bello, another classic CA wine that remains relatively reasonably priced.
James Dietz
Wine guru
1236
Wed Mar 22, 2006 6:45 pm
Orange County, California
Joe Moryl wrote:James Dietz wrote:Those Santa Cruz bottlings can age beautifully. I've had a few of the 1991 and 1995, and they have been stunning. For the price, easily one of the best buys in CA Cab. Thanx for the report on the 2007... and on the Monte Bello, another classic CA wine that remains relatively reasonably priced.
You are kidding about Monte Bello remaining reasonably priced, no?
David M. Bueker
Childless Cat Dad
36368
Thu Mar 23, 2006 11:52 am
Connecticut
Patrick Martin wrote:The 2007 Geyserville was 22% Carignane, 18% Petite Syrah, and 2% Mataro!
califusa wrote:forced Ridge into what became the decision to go with proprietary names for the Monte Bello, Lytton Springs and Geyserville bottlings.
James Dietz wrote:I did say relatively.. certainly compared to other premium Ca Cabs and to other age-worthy Bdx wines. I can buy them in the secondary market for well less than $100, typically. Even classic vintages, like the 1991, are available for around $150. Expensive? Sure. But worth it, at least to me.
califusa wrote:The 2001 contained 56% Cabernet, 36% Merlot and 8% Petite Verdot. It's likely there have been others with less than 75% Cabernet Sauvignon.
Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot, Google AgentMatch, TikTok and 7 guests