The place for all things wine, focused on serious wine discussions.

Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

Moderators: Jenise, Robin Garr, David M. Bueker

no avatar
User

Bob Ross

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

5703

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:39 pm

Location

Franklin Lakes, NJ

Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

by Bob Ross » Thu Feb 17, 2011 3:53 pm

I know that theoretically, the new rules mean that DOCG Prosecco must be produced only in the designated region and only in a certain, small, high-quality growing area within that region.

Well and good, but although I've enjoyed many Proseccos over the years, I've found great variability -- a lovely wine one night might be dreck a month or two later. The biggest problem (apart from storage perhaps) has always been the lack of a date on the bottle -- after six to eight months I've been told Prosecco deteriorates quickly. (No way for me to know since there has been no dating.)

Does anyone know if DOCG Prosecco must be dated?

Regards, Bob
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

by Steve Slatcher » Thu Feb 17, 2011 4:33 pm

Don't know about Prosecco, but it is certainly not a requirement for DOCG.

I don't think you'd ever see a vintage Asti DOCG for example. And I don't think the DOCG ever increased the pleasure of Asti.
no avatar
User

Oliver McCrum

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1076

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 am

Location

Oakland, CA; Cigliè, Piedmont

Re: Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

by Oliver McCrum » Fri Feb 18, 2011 2:51 pm

Bob,

I completely agree that Prosecco is best when fairly recently bottled (as are other 'cuve close' wines, such as Lambrusco or Moscato d'Asti). We make a point to bring the wine in very frequently, at least ten times a year, and we rotate our inventory, precisely for that reason*. The bottling date is usually put on the back label as a kind of code, not always easy to read, I think that's an EU requirement. So if you meant 'dated' in the sense of bottling date, yes, vintage no.

*the second fermentation takes place a number of times throughout the year.
Oliver
Oliver McCrum Wines
no avatar
User

Bob Ross

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

5703

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:39 pm

Location

Franklin Lakes, NJ

Re: Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

by Bob Ross » Fri Feb 18, 2011 3:43 pm

Thanks, Oliver. I really enjoy Prosecco -- maybe I'll have to learn those bottling date conventions. Regards, Bob
no avatar
User

Victorwine

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

2031

Joined

Thu May 18, 2006 9:51 pm

Re: Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

by Victorwine » Fri Feb 18, 2011 7:42 pm

Hi Bob,
Here’s Tom Cannavan’s take on this;

http://www.wine-pages.com/features/prosecco.htm

Salute
no avatar
User

Oliver McCrum

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1076

Joined

Wed Mar 22, 2006 1:08 am

Location

Oakland, CA; Cigliè, Piedmont

Re: Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

by Oliver McCrum » Sat Feb 19, 2011 1:33 am

Thanks for that reference, Victor; coincidentally Sorelle Bronca is my producer, I am delighted that Cannavan agrees with me.
Oliver
Oliver McCrum Wines
no avatar
User

Bob Ross

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

5703

Joined

Sun Mar 26, 2006 10:39 pm

Location

Franklin Lakes, NJ

Re: Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

by Bob Ross » Sat Feb 19, 2011 5:49 am

Thanks, Victor -- very helpful. Regards, Bob
no avatar
User

Steve Slatcher

Rank

Wine guru

Posts

1047

Joined

Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:51 am

Location

Manchester, England

Re: Will the DOCG status for prosecco result in more pleasure?

by Steve Slatcher » Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:51 am

Oliver McCrum wrote:The bottling date is usually put on the back label as a kind of code, not always easy to read, I think that's an EU requirement.

It seems you mean the lot number. It is a requirement to allow traceability should there be problems with any bottle. I'm not sure what a lot is exactly, but I think if bottling goes on over several days you will need a different one for each day. It used to be the case that EVERY bottle had to have a lot number, so bottles from small producers would all say something like "L1" on them, the vintage being otherwise sufficient. But now I understand the lot number is no longer required if there is only one lot per vintage.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: AhrefsBot, ClaudeBot and 5 guests

Powered by phpBB ® | phpBB3 Style by KomiDesign